SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 1581

AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH, PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA
Vijay Pal Yadav – Appellant
Versus
Mamta Singh – Respondent


Table of Content
1. improper police conduct and physical abuse (Para 1 , 2)
2. safeguards for individual rights during arrest (Para 5 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
3. closure of proceedings with warnings (Para 6 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 16)

ORDER :

1. The basic grievance of the petitioner in the present petition is that he was not subjected to due treatment required under law by the police, when they investigated a dispute he had with his neighbour. His contention was that the law, as settled in Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar & Another, (2014) 8 SCC 73 regarding arrest, has been totally flouted. The further contention was that the high-handedness of the police was such that the petitioner was subjected to physical abuse, both at the spot as well as later in the Police Station.

2. In support of such argument, learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn the attention of this Court to the e-mail sent by his brother at 11:24 AM on the same day as also to the concerned Superintendent of Police, where it is alleged that the police had arrested his brother. Learned counsel further reiterated that there was physical abuse at the Police Station, only because an e-mail was sent to the higher officials, as a kn

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top