Amir Khan @ Rinku vs State of M. P.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(MP) 77

G. S. AHLUWALIA
Amir Khan @ Rinku – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent

Advocates:
Vishwanath Pratap Singh Tomar for applicant; Yogesh Parashar, Public Prosecutor for respondents/State.

ORDER

1. This application under section 528 of BNSS has been filed seeking the following relief :-

^^vr% ekuuh; U;k;ky; ls fouez çkFkZuk gS fd] ;kfpdkdrkZ dh v¨j ls çLrqr vkosnu i= Lohdkj fd;k tkdj Qjkj vfÒ;qäx.k d¨ fxjrkj fd, tkus gsrq çfr ;kfpdkdrkZx.k d¨ funsZf'kr fd;k tkus dh Ñik djsaA^^

2. It is submitted by counsel for applicant that on the complaint made by applicant, Crime No.63/2025 has been registered by Police Station Kampoo, District Gwalior, but no further action has been taken by the police and even accused persons have not been arrested.

3. So far as prayer made by applicant for issuing a direction to the police to arrest accused persons and filing of charge-sheet is concerned, the same cannot be granted.

4. The Supreme Court in the case of D. Venkatasubramaniam and others vs. M.K. Mohan Krishnamachari and another reported in (2009) 10 SCC 488 has held as under :-

''19. The High Court, within a period of one month from the date of filing of the petition, finally disposed of the same observing that,

“it is obligatory on the part of the respondent police to conduct investigation in accordance with law, including recording of statements from witnesses, arrest, seizure o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document