SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 1618

J. B. PARDIWALA, R. MAHADEVAN
State Of Haryana – Appellant
Versus
Tilda riceland Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent


Table of Content
1. high court's decision on market fees legality (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
2. conditions for exemption from market fees (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
3. authority's power to recover fees (Para 9 , 10 , 11)
4. disposition of special leave petition (Para 12 , 13)

ORDER :

1. Delay condoned.

2. We heard Mr. Hemant Gupta, the learned counsel appearing for the State of Haryana.

3. This petition arises from the judgment and order passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh dated 22-7-2024 in CWP No.9891 of 2009 (O&M) by which the High Court allowed the writ petition filed by the sole respondent before us and thereby declared that transporting of stock from one market committee to the other would not amount to business transaction or sale and, therefore, the petitioners - herein would not be justified in demanding additional market fees.

4. The High Court in its impugned order has observed in Paras 7, 8 and 9 respectively as under:-

    "7. Thus, we are satisfied that once, market fees has been paid by any individual or the dealer/firm either within the State or outside, it need not to pay it again, on the same stock. Merely transferring the stock from one Market Committee to another, would

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top