SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 1620

SANDEEP MEHTA, VIKRAM NATH
Uttam Rice Mill, Dhamtari – Appellant
Versus
Ashok Construction Company – Respondent


Table of Content
1. background of execution proceedings and judicial decisions. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
2. arguments related to the application of procedural rules. (Para 9 , 13 , 14)
3. court's observations on diligence and conduct of the parties. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 15 , 16)
4. court's final decision and restoration of previous orders. (Para 17)
5. disposal of pending applications. (Para 18)

ORDER :

2. The instant appeal has been preferred by the appellant-defendant against the order dated 26.06.2024 passed by the High Court of Chhattisgarh in M.A. No. 93 of 2019 wherein the High Court had allowed the miscellaneous appeal filed by the respondent-plaintiff and set aside the orders dated 19.04.2018 and 04.10.2019 passed by the Executing Court and essentially restored the execution proceedings initiated by the respondent.

4. After a decade, i.e. on 26.09.2012, the respondent filed for execution of the aforesaid decree in Execution Application No. 16-B/2002 before the Executing Court. While notice had been issued to the appellant-defendant in the aforesaid Execution Application, the Executing Court had further directed the respondent to pay process fee as well as list of movable pr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top