J. K. MAHESHWARI, VIJAY BISHNOI
Govind – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
J.K. MAHESHWARI, J.
1. This appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction of the appellant dated 08.11.20231 [In CRA-D-913-DB-2018 (O&M) passed by High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh] for the charges under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (in short IPC) and for Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959. The High Court1 [In CRA-D-913-DB-2018 (O&M) passed by High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh] vide impugned judgment affirmed the Trial Court2 [Additional Sessions Judge, Jhajjar] judgment dated 29.08.20183 [In Sessions Case No. 39/2016] and also the sentence as directed.
FACTS IN BRIEF
2. The prosecution’s case, in brief, was that an incident took place on 12.06.2016 at 6 am in village M.P. Majra of committing murder of Promila (deceased). An FIR was registered at Police Station Beri, Jhajjar, Haryana by her brother Pradeep. The basis of registration of FIR was a vocal telephonic message received from the Control Room of alleged commission of murder by three boys who arrived in an Alto car bearing registration No. HR-13D-0163 and shot the deceased by means of pistol. Upon receiving the said information, Investigating Officer (IO) ASI Jagbir Singh alon
Manjunath and Others vs. State of Karnataka
Raja Khan vs. State of Chhattisgarh
State of Himachal Pradesh vs. Jeet Singh
State of Maharashtra vs. Bharat Fakira Dhiwar
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.