SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, VIPUL M. PANCHOLI
Kolanjiammal (D) Thr Lrs. – Appellant
Versus
The Revenue Divisional Officer Perambalur District – Respondent
JUDGMENT
VIPUL M. PANCHOLI, J.
1. This is an appeal against the final Judgment dated 07.08.2009 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras in Writ Appeal No. 797 of 2008 and the final Order dated 06.01.2011 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras in Review Application No. 129 of 2009 by which the High Court dismissed the challenge raised by the appellant against the Public Auction Notice issued by the respondent no. 2 on the ground that the sale pursuant to the above said notice has not been challenged by the appellant.
2. The factual matrix of the present case as per the appellant is that in 1972-73, late Ramaswamy Udayar successfully bid for arrack shops in Thevaiyar and Valikandapuram villages but later defaulted on payments, leading the District Collector, Perambalur, to obtain an ex-parte decree in 1987 for Rs. 56,170.20/-. Unaware of this, his widow (the appellant) and family faced recovery proceedings years later. After Ramaswamy’s death in 1988, disputes arose among his legal heirs and while partition proceedings were pending, the authorities issued auction notices in 2005 to recover the alleged dues with interest. Karunanidhi, Ramaswamy’s son and the appellant
Rajasthan Housing Board & Others v. Krishna Kumari
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.