SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 1354

J. B. PARDIWALA, K. V. VISWANATHAN
Popular Caterers – Appellant
Versus
Ameet Mehta – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Chander Uday Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Gaurav Srivastav, Adv. Mr. Pramit Saxena, AOR Ms. Priyanka Gharge, Adv.
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Shailesh Madiyal, Sr. Adv. Ms. Vidhi Pankaj Thaker, AOR Mr. Prastut Mahesh Dalvi, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Singh, Adv. Mr. Jijo Oomen Eappan, Adv. Mr. Yash Chaturvedi, Adv. Mr. Dhananjay Kumar, Adv. Mr. Shashank Shekhar, AOR Mr. Dr. A.M. Singhvi, Sr. Adv. Mr. D.S. Naidu, Sr. Adv. Mr. Shrey Fatterpekar, Adv. Mr. Sumit Chander, Adv. Mr. Nirav Jitesh Marjadi, Adv. Ms. Srushti Bakul Mehta, Adv. Ms. Rebha Jagdish Dogra, Adv. Mr. Kushal Babulal Harnesha, Adv. Ms. Pooja Zagde, Adv. Ms. Mithu Jain, AOR Mr. Mohit khubhchandani, Adv. Ms. Bansuri Swaraj, Sr. Adv. Ms. Nina Nariman, Adv. Ms. Sneha Sanjay Botwe, AOR Mr. Karl Tamboly, Adv. Mr. Siddharth S. Chapalgaonkar, Adv. Mr. Akash Tripathi, Adv. Mr. Saurabh Guha, Adv.

Table of Content
1. disputes arose from the catering contract. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
2. arbitrator ruled in favor of appellant. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18)
3. court considered correctness of stay order. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25)
4. conditions for granting stay of execution. (Para 26 , 27 , 28)
5. decision to set aside high court stay. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33)
6. depository conditions upon appeal conclusion. (Para 34 , 35 , 36)

ORDER :

2. These appeals arise from the common judgment and order passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay dated 22.01.2025 in Interim Application (L) No. 8589 of 2023 filed in Commercial Arbitration (L) Petition No. 7842 of 2023 with Interim Application (L) No. 8941 of 2023 in Commercial Arbitration (L) Petition No. 7800 of 2023 with Interim Application (L) No. 7149 of 2024 in Commercial Arbitration (L) Petition No. 8421 of 2023, respectively, by which the Interim Applications filed by the Award Debtors i.e. the respondents before us came to be allowed, and an unconditional stay of execution of the Arbitral Award dated 28.11.2022 as corrected by the corrigendum dated 19.12.2022 came to be granted till t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top