J. B. PARDIWALA, K. V. VISWANATHAN
Popular Caterers – Appellant
Versus
Ameet Mehta – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. disputes arose from the catering contract. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 2. arbitrator ruled in favor of appellant. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 3. court considered correctness of stay order. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 4. conditions for granting stay of execution. (Para 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 5. decision to set aside high court stay. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 6. depository conditions upon appeal conclusion. (Para 34 , 35 , 36) |
ORDER :
2. These appeals arise from the common judgment and order passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay dated 22.01.2025 in Interim Application (L) No. 8589 of 2023 filed in Commercial Arbitration (L) Petition No. 7842 of 2023 with Interim Application (L) No. 8941 of 2023 in Commercial Arbitration (L) Petition No. 7800 of 2023 with Interim Application (L) No. 7149 of 2024 in Commercial Arbitration (L) Petition No. 8421 of 2023, respectively, by which the Interim Applications filed by the Award Debtors i.e. the respondents before us came to be allowed, and an unconditional stay of execution of the Arbitral Award dated 28.11.2022 as corrected by the corrigendum dated 19.12.2022 came to be granted till t
Lifestyle Equities C.V. and Another vs. Amazon Technologies Inc.
Hindustan Construction Company and Another vs. Union of India and Others
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.