Back
J. B. PARDIWALA, K. V. VISWANATHAN
Lifestyle Equities C. V. – Appellant
Versus
Amazon Technologies Inc. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. stay application process (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. factual background of the case (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. arguments of the plaintiffs (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 4. arguments of the defendant (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 5. analysis of the legal provisions (Para 38 , 39) |
| 6. legal conclusion on unconditional stay (Para 125 , 134) |
| 7. final judgment conclusion (Para 138) |
JUDGMENT :
For the convenience of exposition, this judgment is divided into the following parts:
1. Our Order dated 24.09.2025 passed in the instant petition reads thus:
2. This petition arises from the judgment and order passed by the High Court of Delhi, dated 01.07.2052 in the CM Application No. 26455 of 2025 filed in the RFA(O.S.)(COMM) No. 11 of 2025 by which the application filed by the respondent herein (judgment debtor-original defendant) under Order XLI Rule 5(1) and Rule 5(3) of the CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE , 1908, (for short, “the CPC”) respectively came to be allowed, and thereby the Court stayed the operation of the judgment and money decree dated 25.02.2025 passed by a learned Single Judge in the suit instituted by the petitioner herein. In short, the Divisio
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
