SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(SC) 1862

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Hima Kohli, Ahsanuddin Amanullah, JJ.
Ram Narain & Anr. – Appellants
Versus
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. & Ors. – Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 2681 of 2024 (@ Petition For Special Leave To Appeal (Civil) No. 24921 of 2019)
Decided On : 20-02-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Sharve Singh, Adv. appeared virtually, Mr. Gaurav, AOR
For the Respondent: Mr. Abhishek Gola, Adv., Mr. Viresh B. Saharya, AOR, Mr. Akshat Agarwal, Adv.

The Supreme Court held that the notional income for a deceased minor must reflect potential familial contributions, leading to an enhancement of overall compensation for the claimants.

Headnote:(A) Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Compensation claims - The Tribunal initially awarded Rs.75,000/- for a minor's death, later enhanced by the High Court to Rs.1,56,000/-; Supreme Court found notional income assessment of Rs.15,000/- p.a. inadequate, increased to Rs.1,00,000/- with an additional Rs.70,000/- for conventional damages, interest modified to 9%. (Paras 2, 3, 7)

(B) Notional Income - Assessment of notional income must consider potential contributions of minors to familial income; prior cases used for comparison stress gradual economic changes over time. (Paras 4, 6)

Facts of the case:
Claimants sought enhancement of compensation for their deceased nine-year-old daughter in an accident on 17th December, 1981, initially quantified at Rs.75,000/- by the Tribunal which was raised by High Court to Rs.1,56,000/-.

Findings of Court:
Award modified to Rs.1,00,000/- for notional income and Rs.70,000/- for conventional heads, with simple interest of 9%.

Issues: Adequacy of monetary compensation concerning the loss of a minor child and legally recognized losses pertaining to conventional damages.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that the initial notional income was too low, ensuring a just compensation estimate consistent with economic realities and previous judgments.

Result: Appeal allowed in part.

Table of Content
1. compensation awarded for loss of a child. (Para 2 , 3)
2. reference to previous case for interest enhancement. (Para 4)
3. assessment of notional income for compensation. (Para 6 , 7)
4. modification of the impugned order. (Para 8 , 9)

JUDGMENT :

1. Leave granted.

2. The appellants-claimants are aggrieved by the order dated 31st January, 2018 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad allowing the appeal1[First Appeal from Order No.358 of 2004] filed by them for enhancing the compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal2[For short ‘the Tribunal’] vide order dated 24th November, 2003 whereby, the Tribunal awarded a sum of Rs.75,000/- (Rupees Seventy five thousand only) in favour of the claimants as compensation for the loss of their nine year old daughter, a student studying in Class IV on the date of the accident i.e. 17th December, 1981, by assessing the notional income of the deceased at Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen thousand only) p.a.

3. Under the impugned judgment, the High Court has enhanced the compensation payable to the appellants-claimants to a sum of Rs.1,56,000/- (Rupees One lakh fifty six thousand only) and awarded simple interest @ 9% p.a. from the date of filing of the claim petition till the date of the award and thereafter, reduced the interest to 4% p.a. till the amount is deposited by the respondent No.1-Insurance Company.

4. Citing the decision of this Court in Kishan Gopal and Another vs. Lala and Others, (2014) 1 SCC 244, learned counsel for the appellants-claimants submits that in the said case, the minor child of the claimants was 10 years old and was assisting his parents in their agricultural occupation. The accident in the said case had occurred in the year 1992. Noting that the value of rupee had come down drastically from the year 1992 onwards and further noticing that had the deceased boy been alive, he would have contributed towards the family’s income, this Court had assessed his notional income at Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty thousand only) p.a. and awarded a sum of Rs.4,50,000/- (Rupees Four lakhs fifty thousand only) to the claimants therein. Besides that, a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty thousand only) was awarded under conventional heads towards loss of love and affection, funeral expenses and last rites of the deceased with simple interest @ 9% p.a. The appellant-claimants seek enhancement of interest based on the above decision.

5. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the records.

6. In the present case, the date of the accident was 17th December, 1981, when the minor daughter of the appellants-claimants was 9 years old; she was the only child of the appellants-claimants at that point in time and was studying in Class IV.

7. Given the aforesaid facts, the notional income of 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen thousand only) per month assessed for the deceased victim appears to be on the lower side. This court is of the opinion that a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) ought to be awarded in favour of the appellant-claimants over and above Rs.1,56,000/- (Rupees One lakh fifty six thousand only) awarded by the High Court towards notional income of the victim. Further, we may observe that no amount has been awarded in favour of the appellants – claimants under conventional heads. It is deemed appropriate to award a lump sum amount of Rs.70,000/- (Rupees Seventy thousand only) towards conventional heads. The interest component as awarded by the High Court is also modified and it is directed that the entire amount payable by the respondent-Insurance Company shall carry simple interest @ 9% from the date of filing of the claim petition, till realization.

8. The impugned order stands modified on the aforesaid terms. The respondent-Insurance Company shall recalculate the amount payable to the appellants-claimants and deposit the same with the Tribunal within six weeks from today, after deducting the amount already paid. The said amount shall be relea

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top