SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Raj) 1649

NUPUR BHATI
Samu Devi W/o Megharam – Appellant
Versus
Hariram Godara S/o Dayalram – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Respondent: Mr. Rajat Choudhary on behalf of Mr. D.S. Sodha,

JUDGMENT :

Nupur Bhati, J.

1. Nobody was present on 18.10.2024 on behalf of appellants/claimants even in second round, however, the matter was adjourned to 23.10.2024. It was also directed that in case nobody appears for the appellants, the matter shall be dismissed for non-prosecution.

2. Today also, nobody is present on behalf of appellants/claimants. In the interest of justice, this Court perused the material available on record.

3. The instant misc. appeal, seeking enhancement, has been preferred by the appellants/claimants under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter as ‘the Act’) against the judgment and award dated 09.03.2016 (hereinafter as ‘the impugned award’) passed by learned Judge, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Nagaur (hereinafter as ’the learned Tribunal’) in MAC Case No.122/2012 (CIS No.179/2014) (filed under Section 163A of the Act), whereby the learned tribunal has awarded Rs. 2,00,000/- along with interest @7.5% (from the date of filing of the claim petition i.e., 24.09.2012 to the appellants/claimants and held the respondents/non-claimants jointly and severally liable to pay the said compensation.

4. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that on

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top