SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(SC) 1860

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
A.S. Bopanna, Hima Kohli, JJ.
Savithribai & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
The Divisional Manager, National Insurance Co. Ltd. – Respondent
Civil Appeal No. 3001 of 2023 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 32139 of 2018)
Decided On : 21-04-2023

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Preetam Shah, Adv., Mr. Aditya Sidhra, Adv., Mr. Dhananjay Kumar, Adv., Mr. K. Krishna Kumar, AOR
For the Respondent: Mr. Ambhoj Kumar Sinha, AOR, Mr. Rao K R, Adv.

The court determined enhanced compensation based on appropriate notional income, acknowledging future prospects and deductions for self-expense, resulting in total compensation of Rs.15,69,400.

Headnote:(A) Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Compensation - Enhancement sought for compensation awarded by MACT - Compensation initially awarded Rs.7,33,500/- with 6% interest was deemed inadequate - Notional income of deceased should be Rs.7,000/- per month, leading to total compensation of Rs.15,69,400/- including conventional heads (Paras 3-6).

(B) Loss of Dependency - Calculation of loss of dependency and future prospects - 40% of income added for future prospects; 1/4th deducted for self-expenses leading to net loss of dependency. (Paras 4-5)

Facts of the case:
The appellants sought enhancement of compensation following a motor vehicle accident on 06.05.2012 involving a deceased agriculturist returning from market. MACT awarded Rs.7,33,500/- but appellants contested that this was low compared to the deceased's actual earning potential.

Findings of Court:
Total compensation recognized as Rs.15,69,400/- of which Rs.8,35,900/- is to be paid to appellants above what was previously awarded.

Issues: The primary issue was the appropriate quantum of compensation, given the deceased's occupation and earning potential.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court established that the notional income considered by MACT was lower than the market standards; thus, the enhanced compensation reflects a more accurate assessment of loss incurred by the claimants.

Result: Appeal allowed with enhanced compensation granted.

Table of Content
1. appellants seek compensation enhancement (Para 2 , 3)
2. (Para 4 , 5)
3. entitlement to enhanced compensation (Para 6)
4. conclusion of appeal (Para 7)

JUDGMENT :

1.Leave granted.

2. The appellants are before this Court seeking enhancement of the compensation as against the sum awarded by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (For short ‘MACT’) through its judgment dated 23.10.2014, which is in a sum of Rs.7,33,500/- with interest at 6% per annum. The High Court had dismissed the appeal filed by the appellants on 19.09.2016.

3. The solitary question which arises for consideration in this appeal is with regard to the appropriate quantum of compensation to be awarded. The accident had occurred on 06.05.2012 and the claimants claimed the deceased to be an Agriculturist and Commission Agent and the accident had occurred while he was returning from the market in the vehicle.

4. If these aspects of the matter are kept in view, in a matter of the present nature, the income as reckoned by the MACT even in the absence of proof at Rs.4,500/- is on the lower side since even an unskilled labour would have earned that amount.

5. In that view of the matter, keeping in view the period of accident, it would be appropriate to reckon the notional income of the deceased at Rs,7,000/- per month. 40% of the same amounting to Rs.2,800/- is to be awarded towards the ‘future prospects’. From the total of Rs.9,800/-, 1/4th of the amount in a sum of Rs.2,450/- is to be deducted towards self-expenses. If the same is done, the ‘loss of dependency’ per month would be in a sum of Rs.7,350/-, if taken on the annual basis and the appropriate multiplier of ‘17’ is applied, the amount would be in a sum of Rs.14,99,400/-. A sum of Rs.70,000/- is to be added towards ‘conventional heads’. The total compensation would be in a sum of Rs.15,69,400/-.

6. Since the MACT has awarded a sum of Rs.7,33,500/-, the appellants would be entitled to the enhanced compensation of Rs. 8,35,900/- with interest at 6% per annum from the date of filing the petition before the MACT. The amount shall be calculated and be deposited by the respondent-Insurance Company before the MACT within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment whereupon the same shall be disbursed to the claimants.

7. The appeal is, accordingly, disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top