SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(SC) 1855

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
A.S. Bopanna, M.M. Sundresh, JJ.
Bheemasen Since Deceased Through His Lrs & Anr. – Appellants
Versus
Aravind Bangar & Anr. – Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 6900 of 2023 (@ SLP (C) No. 24051 of 2023 @ Diary No. 37769 of 2019
Decided On : 18-10-2023

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Awanish Kumar, Adv., Mr. S.k. Pandey, Adv., Mr. Anshul Rai, Adv., Mr. Abhinav Garg, Adv., Mr. Anupam Jain, Adv., Mr. Ujjwal Sharma, Adv., Mr. Sanket Shankrappa Ambali, Adv., Ms. Aishwarya N. Hiremath, Adv., Mr. Varnik Kundaliya, Adv., M/S. Dharmaprabhas Law Associates, AOR
For the Respondent: Mr. Rajesh Kumar Gupta, AOR

Determination of compensation in fatal accident claims must consider future income prospects and the appropriate multiplier based on the deceased's age, rather than that of family members.

Headnote:(A) Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Compensation determination - Accident date: 02.03.2008, claimants' son deceased - The Tribunal and High Court assessed income at Rs.37,845/- without considering 30% future prospects - Appropriate income reviewed at Rs.56,767/- deducting 50% for self-expenses, resulting in loss of dependency at Rs.28,384/- monthly. The correct multiplier for deceased’s age was determined to be 16, leading to total compensation of Rs.55,19,680/- after adding Rs.70,000/- for conventional heads. Previous MACT award of Rs.32,92,500/- deducted for revised entitlement of Rs.22,27,180/- with 6% interest. (Paras 4-6)

Findings of Court:
Future prospects and correct multiplier applied as pivotal for compensation award in fatal accident claims. (Paras 5-6)

Issues: The main concern was the method of applying the multiplier based on the deceased's age rather than a parent's age.

Ratio Decidendi: Court established that future income prospects for a deceased should be factored into the compensation assessment; precision in applying the multiplier is vital.

Result: Appeal allowed with enhanced compensation awarded.

Table of Content
1. compensation quantification principles established. (Para 4)
2. proper application of future prospects and multipliers. (Para 5 , 6)
3. final compensation awarded to claimants. (Para 7 , 8)

JUDGMENT :

1. Delay condoned.

2. Leave granted.

3. Heard learned counsel for the appellants as also learned counsel for the respondents and perused the appeals papers.

4. The short issue for consideration in this appeal is with regard to the determination of the appropriate quantum of compensation since the accident having occurred on 02.03.2008 and the son of the claimants having died in the said accident is not in dispute. Insofar as the income of the deceased, the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (For short ‘MACT’) as well as the High Court have taken the same at Rs.37,845/-. However, without applying the principle of law has indicated 30% to be added to the said sum. In this regard, it is noted that the deceased was aged about 31 years and the employment documents at exhibits P-1 to P-4 were taken into consideration for noting the income which is in a regular employment.

5. If that be the position, the deceased having a permanent employment at the said salary and the age being less than 50 years, the future prospects would have to be taken at 50%. Further, the MACT as well as the High Court have wrongly applied the multiplier taking the age of the younger of the parents of the deceased. Since the law is well settled that the multiplier applicable to the age of the deceased is to be taken into consideration, in the instant case the appropriate multiplier would be ‘16’.

6. If these aspects are taken into consideration, as against the salary of Rs.37,845/-, the ‘future prospects’ would amount to Rs.18,922/. The total income, therefore, would be Rs.56,767/-. 50% of the said amount is required to be deducted towards self expenses of the deceased. As such, the ‘loss of dependency’ per month could be in a sum of Rs.28,384/-. If the same is taken on the annual basis and the appropriate multiplier of ‘16’ is applied, the amount would be in a sum of Rs.54,49,680/-. A sum of Rs.70,000/- is added towards the conventional heads. The total amount would be in a sum of Rs.55,19,680/-. Since the MACT has already awarded the sum of Rs.32,92,500/-, if the same is deducted, the appellant would be entitled to the enhanced compensation of Rs.22,27,180/- with interest at 6% per annum from the date of the claim before the MACT till the date of payment of the amount.

7. The enhanced compensation shall be deposited by the Insurance Company before the MACT within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment whereupon the disbursement shall be made to the claimants.

8. The appeal is, accordingly, disposed of.

9. Pending application(s) shall also stand disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top