Back
PANKAJ MITHAL, PRASANNA B. VARALE
Nak Engineering Company Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Tarun Keshrichand Shah – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case (Para 3 , 4 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 2. appellant's arguments for impleadment (Para 11 , 12 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 3. high court's reasoning for revoking impleadment (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. determining necessity of parties in a suit (Para 19 , 32 , 34) |
| 5. legal definitions of necessary and proper parties (Para 33 , 35 , 38) |
| 6. court's confirmation of high court's judgement (Para 39 , 41 , 42) |
| 7. conclusion and final orders of the court (Para 44 , 45 , 46) |
JUDGMENT :
1. Leave granted.
3. Respondent No. 2-Priyalata Keshrichand Shah3 [Hereinafter referred to as ‘respondent No. 2’] is reported to be dead and her interest is represented by respondent No. 1.
5. In a Suit No. 6117 of 2007 filed by respondent No. 1 and respondent No. 2 against respondent No. 3, a Notice of Motion No. 1346 of 2018 was moved to add the appellant as the party defendant to participate and contest the aforesaid suit. Earlier, a Notice of Motion No. 1925 of 2017 was also moved by the appellant seeking to set aside the order to proceed in the said suit ex-parte. Both the said motions were allowed by the court of first instance vide a common Order dated 05.10.2018. However, the said order
Addition of necessary party in suit – Plaintiffs are dominus litis and they cannot be compelled to add a party to defend suit against their wishes.
Code of Civil Procedure under Order 22 Rule 10, deals with the assignment, creation order-volution of any interest. In those cases party can be joined. Those contingencies may occur in case of transf....
The court affirmed that a necessary party is one whose presence is essential for the effective adjudication of a suit, and the trial court has the discretion to add such parties under Order I Rule 10....
The court ruled that a party cannot be impleaded unless their presence is necessary for the effective adjudication of the suit, emphasizing the plaintiff's right as dominus litis.
The court may compel the addition of necessary parties to a suit despite the plaintiff's choice, ensuring all interested parties can be adjudicated effectively.
Object of Order 1 Rule 10 CPC is that person whose presence is necessary before Court, is made a necessary party to effectually adjudicate upon rights of parties and settle all questions involved in ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the discretionary power to add parties under Order 1 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure should be exercised to ensure the effective adjudi....
The court clarified the criteria for necessary parties under Order 1 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, emphasizing that a party's independent claim does not warrant inclusion in a suit if it do....
The determination of necessary parties under Order I Rule 10(2) CPC relies on judicial discretion, emphasizing the dominus litis principle, as a plaintiff cannot be compelled to include parties again....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
