Ravi Shankar Bhushan vs Union of India

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(SC) 52

VIKRAM NATH, SANDEEP MEHTA
Ravi Shankar Bhushan – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner(s): Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta, AOR
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Tushar Mehta, Solicitor General(NP) Mr. Brijender Chahar, A.S.G. Mr. K Parameshwar, Sr.Adv. Mr. Rajeev Kumar Ranjan, Adv. Dr. Alakh Alok Shrivastava, Adv. Mili Baxi, Adv. Sweksha, Adv. Dr. N. Visakamurthy, AOR Mr. Shreekant Neelappa Terdal,aor, Adv. Mr. Shuvodeep Roy, Adv. Mr. Madhav Sinhal, Adv. Mr. Eklavya Dvivedi, Adv. Mr. Amrish Kumar (aor), Sr. Adv. Mr. Aman Mehta, Adv. Mr. Shiv Kumar, Adv. Mr.Jayesh Mishra, Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra, AOR Mr. Sanjay Kapur, AOR Mr Surya Prakash, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Tiwari, Adv. M/S. Mitter & Mitter Co., AOR Mr. Shiv Ram Sharma, AOR Mr. Eklavya Dwivedi, AOR Ms. Praveena Gautam, AOR Mr. Pawan Shukla, Adv. Ms. Tissy Annie Thomas, Adv. Mr. Rohan Bansla, Adv. Mr. P. Parmeswaran, AOR Mr. Jitendra Kumar, AOR Mr. R. N. Keswani, AOR Ms. Shivangi Chawla, Adv. Mr. Tavinder Sidhu, Adv. Mr. Vikas Soni, Adv. Mr. Sumit Gupta, Adv. Ms. Kamini Sharma, Adv. M/S. M. V. Kini & Associates, AOR Mrs. Bina Gupta, AOR Mr. Ram Swarup Sharma, AOR Mr. B. K. Satija, AOR Mr. Rajesh Singh, AOR Mr. Hite, Adv. Mr. Amit Kumar Chawla, Adv. Mr. Akhileshwar Jha, Adv. Mr. Varun Varma, Adv. Ms. Charanjeet Sidhu, Adv. Ms. Swati Vishan, Adv. Ms. Ritika Raj, Adv. Mr. Jatin Malik, Adv. Mr. Rashid Khan, Adv. Mr. Mahi Pal Singh, Adv. Mr. Kamlesh Kumar Pandey, Adv. Mr. Manoj Kumar Rajput, Adv. Mr. Awanish Sinha, AOR

Table of Content
1. implementation of previous judgment provisions. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. compliance affidavit and decisions on financial recoveries. (Para 4 , 5)
3. establishment of statutory framework under rpwd act. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
4. fulfillment of committee's mandate and discharge. (Para 9 , 10)
5. closure of the miscellaneous application. (Para 11)

ORDER

1. Writ Petition (C) Nos. 360 of 2009 and 301 of 2005 (PIL-W) filed seeking implementation of the judgment dated 16th April, 2004 passed in the Indian Banks’ Association , Bombay and others v. Devkala Consultancy Service and others reported in 2004 (11) SCC 1 were disposed of by this Court vide order dated 11th August, 2017.

2. While disposing of the said writ petitions, this Court was pleased to pass the following order:

“ ……….4. With the above observations, we dispose of these petitions with the direction, that the Committee constituted by this Court vide its order dated 14.10.2014 comprising of representatives of Reserve Bank of India, the Comptroller and Auditor General of India, Small Industries Development Bank of India, Union of India and the Indian Banks Association will oversee the implementation of the directions contained i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2026 Supreme(SC) 52

VIKRAM NATH, SANDEEP MEHTARavi Shankar Bhushan – AppellantVersusUnion of India – Respondent

Cases Referred (1)

Related Judgments

Ravi Shankar Bhushan VS Union of India - 2026 Supreme(SC) 52

Santosh Kumar Jha VS Deputy Labour Commissioner (South) - 2021 Supreme(Del) 379

Justice Sunanda Bhandare Foundation VS Union Of India - 2026 4 Supreme 378

In the Matter of Proper Implementation of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 VS Union of India - 2024 Supreme(UK) 623

Oriental Bank of Commerce VS Sunder Lal Jain - 2008 1 Supreme 172

R.Mayilan vs The Branch Manager - 2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 7603

Mohammad Alamgir vs Indian Oil Corporation Limited (IOCL) - 2026 Supreme(Online)(CIC) 1331

National Hydro Electric Power Corporation Ltd. VS National Commission For Scheduled Tribes - 2021 Supreme(Gau) 202

CENTRAL BOARD OF TRUSTEES vs THE REGISTRAR, E.P.F APPELLATE TRIBUNAL & ANR - 2022 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 35

V. Srinivasan VS IDBI Bank Limited - 2024 Supreme(Mad) 2127

VIKRAM NATH, SANDEEP MEHTA
Ravi Shankar Bhushan – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent