SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(SC) 52

VIKRAM NATH, SANDEEP MEHTA
Ravi Shankar Bhushan – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner(s): Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta, AOR
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Tushar Mehta, Solicitor General(NP) Mr. Brijender Chahar, A.S.G. Mr. K Parameshwar, Sr.Adv. Mr. Rajeev Kumar Ranjan, Adv. Dr. Alakh Alok Shrivastava, Adv. Mili Baxi, Adv. Sweksha, Adv. Dr. N. Visakamurthy, AOR Mr. Shreekant Neelappa Terdal,aor, Adv. Mr. Shuvodeep Roy, Adv. Mr. Madhav Sinhal, Adv. Mr. Eklavya Dvivedi, Adv. Mr. Amrish Kumar (aor), Sr. Adv. Mr. Aman Mehta, Adv. Mr. Shiv Kumar, Adv. Mr.Jayesh Mishra, Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra, AOR Mr. Sanjay Kapur, AOR Mr Surya Prakash, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Tiwari, Adv. M/S. Mitter & Mitter Co., AOR Mr. Shiv Ram Sharma, AOR Mr. Eklavya Dwivedi, AOR Ms. Praveena Gautam, AOR Mr. Pawan Shukla, Adv. Ms. Tissy Annie Thomas, Adv. Mr. Rohan Bansla, Adv. Mr. P. Parmeswaran, AOR Mr. Jitendra Kumar, AOR Mr. R. N. Keswani, AOR Ms. Shivangi Chawla, Adv. Mr. Tavinder Sidhu, Adv. Mr. Vikas Soni, Adv. Mr. Sumit Gupta, Adv. Ms. Kamini Sharma, Adv. M/S. M. V. Kini & Associates, AOR Mrs. Bina Gupta, AOR Mr. Ram Swarup Sharma, AOR Mr. B. K. Satija, AOR Mr. Rajesh Singh, AOR Mr. Hite, Adv. Mr. Amit Kumar Chawla, Adv. Mr. Akhileshwar Jha, Adv. Mr. Varun Varma, Adv. Ms. Charanjeet Sidhu, Adv. Ms. Swati Vishan, Adv. Ms. Ritika Raj, Adv. Mr. Jatin Malik, Adv. Mr. Rashid Khan, Adv. Mr. Mahi Pal Singh, Adv. Mr. Kamlesh Kumar Pandey, Adv. Mr. Manoj Kumar Rajput, Adv. Mr. Awanish Sinha, AOR

Table of Content
1. implementation of previous judgment provisions. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. compliance affidavit and decisions on financial recoveries. (Para 4 , 5)
3. establishment of statutory framework under rpwd act. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
4. fulfillment of committee's mandate and discharge. (Para 9 , 10)
5. closure of the miscellaneous application. (Para 11)

ORDER

2. While disposing of the said writ petitions, this Court was pleased to pass the following order:

3. The present Miscellaneous Application has been filed in pursuance of the aforesaid order, whereby this Court directed the said Committee to oversee the implementation of the directions issued.

5. The gist of the compliance affidavit is noted hereinbelow: -

6. In view of the compliance of the directions issued vide order dated 14th October, 2014, the CAG has sought to be relieved of the responsibility as Chairperson of the Committee constituted by this Court.

    “86. National Fund for persons with disabilities. —

    (1) There shall be constituted a Fund to be called the National Fund for persons with disabilities and there shall be credited thereto –

    a. all sums available under the Fund for people with disabilities, constituted vide notification

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top