SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
J.B. PARDIWALA, R. MAHADEVAN, JJ.
Elegna Co-Op. Housing and Commercial Society Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Limited and Another – Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 10261 of 2025
WITH
Takshashila Heights India Private Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Limited and Another – Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 10012 of 2025
Decided On : 15-01-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the appeals and relevant facts. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments regarding procedural impropriety and rights of stakeholders. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. court's reasoning on the necessity of fairness and rules in insolvency processes. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. court's final ruling and directives. (Para 15) |
JUDGMENT :
R. MAHADEVAN, J.
1. The present appeals are directed against the final judgment and order dated 01.07.2025 passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal1 [For short “NCLAT”] Principal Bench, New Delhi, in Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 2261 of 2024.
2. By the impugned judgment, the NCLAT set aside the order dated 06.11.2024 passed by the Adjudicating Authority, National Company Law Tribunal2 [For short “NCLT”] Ahmedabad Bench, in CP (IB) No. 140 (AHM) / 2024, and directed admission of the application filed under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 20163 [For short “IBC”] thereby initiating the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process4 [For short “CIRP”] against the appellant in C.A. No. 10012 of 2025 – Takshashila Heights India Private Limited. The NCLAT further rejected the intervention application filed by the appellant in C.A. No. 10261 of 2025 – Elegna Co-operative Housing and Commercial Society Ltd.5 [For short “Society”] on the ground that it lacked locus standi to intervene in the aforesaid company appeal.
3. For the sake of convenience, the parties to the present appeals are arrayed as under:
| Name of the Party | Before NCLT [CP (IB) No. 104(AHM)/2024] | Before NCLAT [CA (AT) (Ins.) No. 2261 of 2024] | Before this Court [CA No. 10261 of 2025/CA No. 10012 of 2025] |
| Elegna Cooperative Housing and Commercial Society Ltd. | Not a party | Intervenor | Appellant |
| Takshashila Heights India Private Ltd. (Corporate Debtor) | Respondent | Respondent | Respondent No. 2/Appellant |
| Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd. (Financial Creditor) | Applicant | Appellant | Respondent No. 1/Respondent |
Brief facts
4. The necessary facts leading to the filing of the present appeals are as follows:
4.1. The appellant in C.A. No. 10012 of 2025 (Corporate Debtor) availed financial assistance of Rs. 70 crores from ECL Finance Ltd. (Original Lender), on 19.07.2018 under two term loan facilities, for the purpose of developing a residential-cum- commercial project titled “Takshashila Elegna”. To secure the said facilities, the Corporate Debtor and its promoters executed loan agreements, promissory notes, and other security documents on 25.07.2018 (for Term Loan – I of Rs. 40 crores) and 26.09.2018 (for Term Loan – II of Rs.30 crores). An Indenture of Mortgage was subsequently executed on 04.09.2020 in favour of the Original Lender to secure repayment of the said loans. There was delay in repayment of the loan instalments and the Corporate Debtor made its last payment on 30.09.2021, after which the loan accounts were classified as Non-Performing Assets (NPA) on 30.12.2021.
4.2. On 09.05.2022, the Original Lender executed an Assignment Agreement transferring all its rights, title, and interest in the said loan to Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd.6 [For short “EARCL”] (Financial Creditor). Following the same, the Financial Creditor issued a recall and invocation of guarantee notice dated 31.05.2022, demanding a sum of Rs. 53,03,18,487/- from the Corporate Debtor and its personal guarantors against Term Loans I and II. They also initiated recovery proceedings by filing of O.A. No. 367 of 2022 before the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Ahmedabad, and issued a demand notice dated 21.07.2022 under Section 13 (2) of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 for Rs. 57,24,96,064/- as on 30.06.2022.
4.3. Pursuant to commercial discussions, the Corporate Debtor and the Financial Debtor entered into a Restructuring – cum – One Time Settlement Agreement on 23.05.2023, under which the Corporate Debtor agreed to discharg
Pioneer Urban Land and Infrastructure Ltd. v. Union of India
Chitra Sharma v. Union of India
Innoventive Industries Ltd v. ICICI Bank
Swiss Ribbons (P) Ltd. v. Union of India
Vidarbha Industries Power Ltd v. Axis Bank Ltd. (2022) 8 SCC 352 [Para 6.3]
Mobilox Innovations Pvt. Ltd. v. Kirusa Software Pvt. Ltd. (2018) 1 SCC 353 [Para 6.4]
GLAS Trust Co. LLC v. BYJU Raveendran
Indus Biotech Private Ltd. v. Kotak India Venture (Offshore) Fund and others
Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. v. A. Balakrishnan and Another
Haldiram Incorporation (P) Ltd. v. Amrit Hatcheries (P) Ltd. 2023 SCC Online SC 1706 [Para 12.15]
Karad Urban Cooperative Bank Limited v. Swwapnil Bhingardevay and others
Phoenix ARC Pvt. Ltd v. Spade Financial Services Ltd.
Bishambhar Prasad v. Arfat Petrochemicals Pvt. Ltd. and Others
AI
The court affirmed that once debt and default are established under Section 7 of the IBC, admission into CIRP is mandatory, preventing misuse of the process as merely a recovery mechanism.
The dismissal of the application under Section 65 demonstrates that mere allegations of malice and fraud in insolvency proceedings require substantiation with clear evidence; insufficient for halting....
The Court can exercise powers under Article 142 of the Constitution of India to permit withdrawal of CIRP proceedings, considering the larger interest and the IBC's objective to balance the interests....
CIRP initiated by homebuyers of one real estate project against developer must be confined to that project only, not extended corporate-wide, to protect other projects and stakeholders.
(1) Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process – Timeline starts ticking only from date of admission of application for initiation of CIRP and not from date of filing the same – There is no fixed time l....
The Tribunal held that applicants who withdrew from a real estate project and obtained Recovery Certificates cannot pursue corporate insolvency under IBC, thus failing to meet the mandatory allottees....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.