Karnataka HC Notices Sri Lankan Judge's Rights Plea
07 Mar 2026
Karnataka Proposes Social Media Ban for Under-16s
07 Mar 2026
Justice Dharmadhikari Sworn In as 55th Madras HC Chief Justice
07 Mar 2026
Punjab HC Acquits Ram Rahim in Journalist Murder
07 Mar 2026
Appellate Courts Can Rely on Unexhibited Public Documents Produced by Plaintiff: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Under Section 100 CPC
07 Mar 2026
Punjab & Haryana HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in Murder via Humiliation Case: Sections 103(1) & 3(5) BNS
07 Mar 2026
Security Deposit Forfeiture Without Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Himachal Pradesh High Court
07 Mar 2026
S.202 CrPC Inquiry Not Mandatory for Public Servant Complaints If Accused Outside Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
09 Mar 2026
Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse
09 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
J. B. PARDIWALA, R. MAHADEVAN
Elegna Co-Op. Housing and Commercial Society Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Limited – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
JUDGMENT :
R. MAHADEVAN, J.
1. The present appeals are directed against the final judgment and order dated 01.07.2025 passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal1 [For short “NCLAT”] Principal Bench, New Delhi, in Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 2261 of 2024.
2. By the impugned judgment, the NCLAT set aside the order dated 06.11.2024 passed by the Adjudicating Authority, National Company Law Tribunal2 [For short “NCLT”] Ahmedabad Bench, in CP (IB) No. 140 (AHM) / 2024, and directed admission of the application filed under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 20163 [For short “IBC”] thereby initiating the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process4 [For short “CIRP”] against the appellant in C.A. No. 10012 of 2025 – Takshashila Heights India Private Limited. The NCLAT furth
The court affirmed that once debt and default are established under Section 7 of the IBC, admission into CIRP is mandatory, preventing misuse of the process as merely a recovery mechanism.
The Tribunal held that applicants who withdrew from a real estate project and obtained Recovery Certificates cannot pursue corporate insolvency under IBC, thus failing to meet the mandatory allottees....
The court established that insolvency processes for real estate should be project-specific, protecting homebuyers and ensuring fair treatment of creditors.
Investment agreements with assured returns classify creditors under IBC, necessitating compliance with Section 7 application thresholds.
The court affirmed the distinction between speculative investors and genuine homebuyers under the IBC, emphasizing that the Insolvency framework is meant for genuine claims and not for speculative pr....
The court ruled that the NCLAT erred in approving a settlement without adhering to the procedural requirements of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, emphasizing the collective nature of insolvency p....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article