PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, JOYMALYA BAGCHI
All India Football Federation – Appellant
Versus
Rahul Mehra – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. establishment of aiff and historical context. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. need for governance reforms in aiff. (Para 4 , 12 , 18) |
| 3. impugned order and compliance with sports law. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. disqualification criteria based on criminal charges. (Para 22 , 24 , 60 , 62) |
| 5. eligibility and representation of eminent players. (Para 26 , 29 , 38) |
| 6. need for amendments under judicial oversight. (Para 92 , 95 , 101 , 110) |
JUDGMENT :
Content | |
1. | Establishment of All India Football Federation and its history thereafter |
2. | Issues for Consideration: |
i. | Re: Eminent Players in the General Body. |
ii. | Re: Eligibility Criteria for Eminent Players |
iii. | Re: The definition of “Office-Bearers” |
iv. | Re: Number of Vice-Presidents |
v. | Re: On Disqualification Event(s) |
a) | Disqualification on Criminal Charge and Conviction |
b) | Disqualification on being or becoming a Public Servant or holding any office in a sports or athletic association or federation apart from Football, except the IOA |
c) | Disqualification of persons who has served as an office-bearer of any NSF from holding a post in the AIFF |
vi. | Re: On retaining ‘indirect interest’ in the definition of ‘Conflict of interest’ |
vii. | Re: On the applicability of AIFF Constit |
Damyanti Naranga v. Union of India
BCCI v. Cricket Association of Bihar, (2016) 8 SCC 535 [Para 44, 57
Public Interest Foundation v. Union of India
BCCI v. Cricket Assn. of Bihar, (2022) 19 SCC 30 [Para 55
Indian Olympic Association v. Union of India
BCCI v. Cricket Assn. of Bihar
BCCI v. Cricket Assn. of Bihar
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.