SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH, R. MAHADEVAN, JJ.
Richa Pratik Kulshreshth – Petitioner
Versus
Manjula Pradip Kulshreshth – Respondent
Transfer Petition (Criminal) No. 507 of 2025 With Interlocutory Application No. 42388 of 2026
Decided On : 20-02-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. settlement terms between parties (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. court's endorsement of settlement (Para 8) |
| 3. granting of divorce by mutual consent (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
ORDER
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The petitioner and the respondent are present in-person in Court and have been identified by their respective counsel.
3. The present transfer petition has been filed seeking transfer of Cr.M.A. No.875 of 2025, titled “Manjula Pradip Kulshreshth v. Richa Pratik Kulshreshth”, pending before the Court of 4th Additional Civil & Judicial Magistrate First Class, Old High Court Building, Navragpura, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, to the Court of JFMC, Narmadapuram, Madhya Pradesh.
4. Initially, the parties were sent for mediation at their request.
5. Today, we are informed that the parties have arrived at a settlement and have filed IA No. 42388 of 2026 seeking various reliefs. The Settlement Agreement dated 09.01.2026 is a part of the said application. We have also interacted with the parties and they accept that the application has been filed by them jointly and they are agreeable to the terms noted in the said Settlement Agreement.
6. For the purposes of ready reference, the Settlement Agreement dated 09.01.2026 is reproduced hereunder:
This Settlement Agreement is entered into between Petitioner- Ms. Richa Pratik Kulshreshth W/o Pratik Kulshreshth, R/o. Ward No. 13, Kalikanagar, Narmada Puram Madhya Pradesh, (here in after referred to as Petitioner/Wife) and Ms. Manjula Pradip Kulshreshth W/o Pradip Kulshreshth, R/o B- 6/72 Goyal Intercity, Drive in Road Ahmedabad (here in after referred to as Respondent) and Mr. Pratik Kulshreshth S/o Pradip Kulshreshth R/o B-6/72 Goyal Intercity, Drive In Road Ahmedabad, Currently resided at 54 Yamuna, SBI Staff Quarters, Opposite Heera Panna Mall, Oshiwara, Andheri (West), Mumbai – 400102 (here in after referred to as Husband of Petitioner).
1. Whereas the marriage between the petitioner and Respondent/ Husband was solemnized as per Hindu rites and ceremonies on 25.11.2020 at Narmadapuram Hoshangabad, Madhya Pradesh. After marriage parties resided together at Ahmedabad and there is no issue out of this wedlock.
2. Both the parties resided together as husband and wife till 28 April 2024, and thereafter disputes and differences arose between the parties and since then she is staying with her parents at Narmadapuram Hoshangabad, Madhya Pradesh. The Respondent/ Husband has filed Divorce Petition/ RCS HM/174/ 2024 before the Family Court at Narmadapuram, Madhya Pradesh seeking dissolution of marriage.
3. Whereas the Parties have filed following cases against each other:-
(i) Husband of Petitioner, has filed Divorce Petition/ RCS HM/174/ 2024 before the Family Court at Narmadapuram, Madhya Pradesh.
(ii) Petitioner/wife has filed Complaint No. UNCR/352/2025 pending before JMFC-I, Narmadapuram, Madhya Pradesh.
(iii) Respondent has filed a Complaint No. CRMAJ875/2025 under D.V. Act, 2005 pending before CJM, Ahmedabad.
(iv) Petitioner/wife has lodged FIR No. 0616/2024 P.S. Hoshangabad, Kotwali, Under Section 498A, 34 of IPC and 3 & 4 of PREVENTION OF DOWRY ACT , 1961.
(v) Petitioner/wife has filed a Maintenance Case No. MJC R/179/2024 Under Section 144 (1) BNSS , 2023 pending before Narmadapuram Family Court.
(vi) Petitioner/wife has filed a Complaint No. MJCR/657/2025 which is pending before One Stop Centre.
4. Whereas Hon’ble Supreme Court vide Order dated 10.09.2025 in Transfer Petition (Crl) No. 507 of 2025 has referred the matter to Supreme Court Mediation Centre. Comprehensive mediation sessions were held between the parties and their respective advocates on 23.09.2025, 15.10.2025, 29.10.2025, 15.11.2025, 29.11.2025, 12.12.2025 (physical and virtual both) and today i.e. 09.01.2026 (physically for signing of the present Settlement Agreement).
5. Both the parties hereto have arrived at an amicable settlement on the following terms and conditions for dissolution of marriage by
The court has the authority to dissolve a marriage by mutual consent when parties reach an amicable settlement, emphasizing mediation's role in legal disputes.
The court granted a decree of divorce by mutual consent under Article 142 of the Constitution, recognizing the irretrievable breakdown of the marriage and the settlement reached between the parties.
The court granted a decree of divorce by mutual consent under Article 142 of the Constitution, recognizing the validity of the parties' Settlement Agreement.
The court can exercise jurisdiction under Article 142 of the Constitution to dissolve a marriage by mutual consent and may dispense with statutory requirements based on precedent.
The court upheld the mutual consent divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act, recognizing the validity of the settlement agreement between the parties.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.