VIKRAM NATH, SANDEEP MEHTA
Anurag Krishna Sinha – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent
The Srimati Radhika Sinha Institute and Sachchidanand Sinha Library (Institute & Library) were established in 1924 by Shri Sachchidanand Sinha (Settlor), a prominent public figure and first interim President of the Constituent Assembly, in memory of his wife, Smt. Radhika Sinha. (!) (!) The Settlor offered Rs.50,000 from the sale of ancestral property belonging to Smt. Radhika Sinha to the then Governor of Bihar and Orissa, which was accepted, leading to the laying of the foundation stone on 28th March 1922 and completion of construction. (!) He also donated approximately 10,000 volumes of books and an additional Rs.50,000 for maintenance. (!) On 9th February 1924, the Institute & Library were formally opened by the Governor. The Settlor made an oral declaration constituting a trust, appointed trustees (including himself as Trustee, Honorary Secretary, and Chief Executive Officer), and a formal Deed of Trust was executed on 10th March 1926, signed by all trustees including the Chief Justice of the Patna High Court as an ex officio trustee. (!) (!) The Trust Deed provided for the eldest male member of the family to serve as Honorary Secretary and Chief Executive Officer, and stipulated that in the event of Trust failure, the property would revert to the Settlor's family. (!)
The appellant, Anurag Krishna Sinha, is the great-grandson of the Settlor and current Trustee, Honorary Secretary, and Chief Executive Officer. (!) On 24th November 1955, an agreement was entered between the Government of Bihar and the Trust, according the Institute & Library the status of State Central Library, with control and management vesting in the trustees and the State providing financial assistance per budgetary allocations. (!) The State Librarian acted as ex-officio Chief Librarian with responsibility for general supervision, subject to trustees' directions. (!) (!)
In 1983, the State promulgated the Smt. Radhika Sinha Institute and Sachchidanand Sinha Library (Acquisition and Management) Ordinance, 1983, seeking to acquire and vest the Trust in the State, challenged by the then Honorary Secretary (appellant's father) in Patna High Court (C.W.J.C. No.2458 of 1983), where interim stay was granted. The ordinance lapsed on 14th August 1983, followed by a second ordinance on 12th August 1983 which also lapsed. The High Court upheld the acquisition despite lapse, but the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.2208 of 1984 (20th February 1996) declared actions under the ordinances non est, restoring the Trust. (!)
Over three decades later, the Bihar Legislature enacted the Srimati Radhika Sinha Institute and Sachchidanand Sinha Library (Requisition & Management) Act, 2015 (impugned Act), published on 6th May 2015, providing for State takeover. (!) The appellant challenged it via C.W.J.C. No.7940 of 2015 before Patna High Court, securing interim stay on 22nd May 2015 (State's SLP dismissed by Supreme Court on 13th July 2015). (!) On 29th February 2024, the High Court dismissed the writ, upholding the Act, holding the Trust as public (not governed by Indian Trusts Act), dedicated to Patna's public, financed by State, with public interest in "better management and development," and State obliged to carry out Trust objects. (!) (!) (!)
The present Civil Appeal No.13581 of 2025 challenges the High Court's order. (!) (!) No allegations of mismanagement were raised by State in correspondence, pleadings, or arguments before High Court; no prior inquiry, notice, or opportunity was given to Trust. (!) (!) Post-Act, State sanctioned Rs.72.89 crores for development (Rs.16.24 crores released), including heritage rejuvenation and new building. (!) A Bihar library survey noted 540 public libraries in 1960s reduced to 51 in poor condition. (!)
Key Act provisions: Section 2(a)-(b) defines Institute & Library; Section 3 vests rights, title, interest in State; Section 4(2) dissolves Trust Deed, agreements, committees; Sections 5-6 require trustees to hand over assets/documents; Section 7 limits compensation to max. Rs.1. (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!)
JUDGMENT :
VIKRAM NATH, J.
1. The present appeal challenges the final judgment and order dated 29th February 2024 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Patna in Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7940 of 2015 whereby the appellant’s writ petition has been dismissed by the High Court while upholding the validity of the Srimati Radhika Sinha Institute and Sachchidanand Sinha Library (Requisition & Management) Act, 20151[Hereinafter, “The Act”].
A. Background
2. The case before us concerns the Smt. Radhika Sinha Institute and Sachchidanand Sinha Library2[Hereinafter, “Institute & Library”], an institution that has been in existence for nearly a century. To appreciate the controversy, it is necessary to briefly trace the history of the Institute & Library and the circumstances in which it was established.
3. The Institute & Library were established in the year 1924 by Shri Sachichidanand Sinha3[The “Settlor”], a distinguished public figure of his time and a prominent son of the State of Bihar, who served as the first President of the Constituent Assembly for an interim period. The Institute & Library was founded in memory of his wife, Smt. Radhika Sinha. For this purpose, Shri Sachichidan
Innoventive Industries Ltd vs. ICICI Bank
In Re: Expeditious Trial of cases under Section 138 of the N.I.Act, 1881
Saregama (India) Ltd vs. Next Radio Ltd.
S.G. Jaisinghani v. Union of India
State of Mysore v. S.R. Jayaram
E.P. Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu
Ajay Hasia v. Khalid Mujib Sehravardi
Indian Express Newspapers (Bombay) Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India
K.R. Lakshmanan v. State of Tamil Nadu
A.P. Dairy Development Corporation Federation v. B. Narasimha Reddy
Shayara Bano v. Union of India
Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration
State of Andhra Pradesh v. McDowell & Co.
(1) Srimati Radhika Sinha Institute and Sachchidanand Sinha Library (Requisition & Management) Act, 2015 is declared unconstitutional and accordingly struck down – Mere passage of time does not suppl....
Right to equality – Though a legislation affecting a single entity or a single undertaking or a single person would be permissible in law, it must be on the basis of reasonable classification having ....
The court ruled that leases granted under conflict of interest and without adherence to natural justice principles are void ab initio, emphasizing the need for public officials to maintain integrity ....
Legislation affecting an individual is constitutional if justified by public interest and adequate grounds, confirming state legislative authority over property transactions.
Sub-section (2) of section 7 of impugned Act reads amount payable under sub-section (1) shall be 500 times of lease rental as is evidenced in records.
State legislation cannot provide lesser compensation than that guaranteed under parliamentary law, rendering it repugnant and unconstitutional.
The Sikh Gurdawaras and Religious Endowment Act, 1973 does not violate constitutional rights as the legislature possesses the authority to regulate religious property management.
The taking over of management of private medical colleges under state law, aimed at regulating capitation fees, is constitutional as it serves public interest without contravening rights under Articl....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.