IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, KSHITIJ SHAILENDRA, JJ.
Executive Committee Maulana Mohamad Ali Jauhar Trust – Appellant
Versus
State Of U.P. And Others – Respondents
Writ C No.7022 of 2023
Decided on : 18-03-2024
JUDGMENT :
1. The Executive Committee of Maulana Mohammad Ali Jauhar Trust through its authorized signatory has invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an Office Memorandum dated 31.01.2023 (for short the ‘Office Memorandum’) issued by the Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Minority Welfare and Waqf, U.P. Civil Secretariat, Lucknow, withdrawing permission to attach Maulana Mohammad Ali Jauhar Trust (for short ‘the Trust’) with the Maulana Mohammad Ali Jauhar Technical and Research Institute, Rampur (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Research Institute’) and grant it on lease to the Trust and further terminating the lease deed dated 04.02.2015 and also the Rectification Deed dated 22.05.2015. A notice dated 15.02.2023 issued by the District Minority Welfare Officer, District Rampur, whereby the Manager of the Trust has been directed to vacate the premises of the Research Institute, has also been challenged. The writ petition was amended pursuant to an order dated 21.03.2023 and a further challenge was made to a notice dated 06.03.2023 issued by the District Minority Welfare Officer directing the Manager of the Trust to vacate the premises within a period of fifteen days, failing which possession would be taken by the Administration. A writ of mandamus has also been prayed for directing the respondents to remove the seal placed on the gate of the institution with a further prayer that the respondents be directed not to take any coercive measure against the petitioner trust on the strength of impugned order/Office Memorandum/notice. An order dated 31.01.2023 issued by the Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Minority Welfare and Waqf, Lucknow, has also been challenged whereby the Divisional Minority Welfare Officer, Moradabad Region, District Moradabad, and the District Minority Welfare Officer, Rampur have been directed to resume possession of the land of the Research Institute and inform the Government about the same.
FRAME OF THE WRIT PETITION
2. The facts of the case, as culled out from the writ petition, are that the petitioner trust is a society registered under the provisions of the Societies Registration Act, 1860, its registration having been granted on 24.04.1995 and renewed from time to time. The primary aims and objectives of the trust, as per the petitioner, is to undertake philanthropic activities for the purposes of fostering scientific temperament among the persons belonging to the minority community and to take steps for their social and educational upliftment as set out in the Memorandum of Association, appended as Annexure No.6 to the writ petition.
3. It is pleaded that, in the year 2005, the then Chief Minister made public announcement for launching different projects for the welfare of the persons belonging to the minority community and, amongst the same, the Government, in remembrance of the contributions made by Maulana Mohammad Ali Jauhar in the freedom struggle as also in the Khilafat Movement, decided to set up a training and research institute in Rampur. It is pleaded that the primary objective of the research institute was to outline and prepare plans for economic and educational developments of the persons belonging to the minority community and the institution was at liberty to run programmes for effective development of such persons. Accordingly, the Department of Minority Welfare and Waqf, Government of U.P. established a research institute at Village Thothar, District Rampur in the name and style of ‘Maulana Mohammad Ali Jauhar Training and Research Institute’ (for short ‘the Research Institute’), which is spread over a total area of 13140 square meters, out of which constructions in the shape of building existed over 4252.07 square meters and the remaining area, i.e. 8887.93 square meters was in the shape of an open land.
4.
A.C. Muthiah Vs. Board of Control for Cricket in India and others
A.K. Kraipak Vs. Union of India
Board of Control for Cricket in India Vs. Cricket Association of Bihar
Cinnamond v. British Airports Authority
Common Cause Vs. Union of India
Dharampal Satyapal Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise, Gauhati and others
Dipak Babaria Vs. State of Gujarat & others
Electrosteel Castings Ltd. Vs. U.V. Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd
Gadde Venkateswara Rao Vs. Govt. of A.P.
Harbanslal Sahnia and another Vs. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. and others
Institute of Law, Chandigarh Vs. Neeraj Sharma
K. Balasubramanian (Ex. Capt.) vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Kaushal Kishore Vs. State of U.P.
Orissa Olympic Association through General Secretary Vs. State of Orissa and another
Ram & Shyam Co. Vs. State of Haryana
Re Natural Resources Allocation
R. Sai Bharathi Vs. J. Jayalalitha and others
Sachidanand Pandey Vs. State of West Bengal
Secretary, Jaipur Development Authority Vs. Daulat Mal Jain
Satluj Jal Vidyut Nigam Vs. Raj Kumar Rajinder Singh
State (NCT of Delhi) Vs. Union of India
Satyan Vs. Deputy Commissioner and others
UMC Technologies Private Limited Vs. Food Corporation of India and another
The court ruled that leases granted under conflict of interest and without adherence to natural justice principles are void ab initio, emphasizing the need for public officials to maintain integrity ....
Government actions must be in conformity with reason and public interest. The Government cannot act arbitrarily and must act for the public good.
The appointment of an authorized controller under the U.P. Intermediate Education Act must adhere to principles of natural justice, requiring the decision-maker to provide a fair hearing and avoid bi....
Advocates appeared :For the Appellant : Ravish Agrawal, Sanjay Agrawal For the Respondent : Pushpendra Yadav, R. N. Singh, Akshay Pawar
The allocation of government land to the Indian School of Business is lawful and serves a public interest, underlining the government's responsibility to ensure transparency and equitable use of publ....
The court affirmed the authority of the state to make land allocations at concessional rates for public interest educational purposes, emphasizing judicial restraint in reviewing policy decisions.
Administrative authorities must apply the principle of equality under Article 14, ensuring consistent and fair treatment, particularly in cases of similar circumstances and rights related to governme....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.