KRISHAN PAHAL
Kusum Devi – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. List has been revised.
2. Heard Sri Daya Shankar Mishra, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri Abhishek Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Ved Prakash Shukla, learned counsel for the informant and Sri Sunil Kumar, learned A.G.A. for the State as well as perused the material placed on record.
3. The present anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicants in Case Crime No.75 of 2022, under Section 306 IPC at Police Station-Naini, District Prayagraj with a prayer to enlarge them on anticipatory bail.
PROSECUTION STORY:
4. The deceased, who happens to be the husband of the informant, is stated to be a Marine Engineer and had left his job and started doing the contract job at Prayagraj as his father had fallen ill and was bed ridden, but the said money earned used to be transferred to the account of his ailing father, as such his family was dependent on the money being given to them by his father Balram Mishra, who has subsequently expired. Out of the said wedlock, there is a five year old daughter. The deceased is stated to have committed suicide in the night of 5/6.01.2022 and the informant could reach the house of her in-laws
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.