Back
SANJAY KAROL, AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH
Deepesh Maheswari – Appellant
Versus
Renu Maheswari – Respondent
Key Points: - Appeal challenges concurrent rejection of application under Order IX Rule XIII CPC to set aside ex-parte Succession Certificate granted under Section 372 of Indian Succession Act (!) (!) (!) - Respondents (daughters) applied for Succession Certificate claiming retiral benefits of deceased father, stating mother predeceased him; court granted it ex-parte despite official records naming wife as Malti Maheswari (!) - Appellant No.1 was a minor (aged 12) at the time, not impleaded; public notice issued but did not specify deceased's name clearly, and minor legally incapacitated from responding independently (!) (!) - Lower courts rejected Order IX Rule XIII application, noting service and prior appeal participation; High Court held minor not a necessary party as he claimed no rights (!) (!) (!) - Primary requirements under Order IX Rule XIII CPC: whether summons duly served and sufficient cause for non-appearance (!) - Succession Certificate liable to revocation under Section 383 if application defective, facts suppressed/misstated; here, discrepancies like misstating minor's mother as wife of another and non-impleadment of minor (!) (!) - Scope of Section 96 CPC and Order IX Rule XIII distinct; latter confers wider jurisdiction to show sufficient cause for non-appearance (!) - No evidence of collusion between minor and mother; minor attained majority before challenging (!) - Supreme Court allowed appeal, quashed ex-parte Succession Certificate, restored matter for expeditious disposal within one year (!) (!)
JUDGMENT :
SANJAY KAROL, J.
Leave granted.
2. This appeal questions the correctness of the concurrent rejection of an application under Order IX Rule XIII Code of Civil Procedure, 19081[CPC], filed by the present appellant before the First Civil Judge, Class-I, Shivpuri, Madhya Pradesh in Misc. Case No.08 of 2014 as per order dated 14th October 2014 as upheld by the Fourth Additional District Judge, Shivpuri, in Misc. Appeal No.01 of 2018 in terms of order dated 10th January, 2019, and by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Gwalior, in Civil Revision No.376 of 2019 by order dated 31st October 2019.
3. The respondents No.1 and No. 2, namely Renu and Jyoti Maheswari respectively, had filed an application under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act, 19252[372. Application for certificate.-
(1) Application for such a certificate shall be made to the District Judge by a petition signed and verified by or on behalf of the applicant in the manner prescribed by the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, (5 of 1908.) for the signing and verification of a plaint by or on behalf of a plaintiff, and setting forth the following particulars, namely--
(a) the time of the death of the deceased;
(b) the ordina
Parimal VS Veena @ Bharti - 2011 1 Supreme 731: No keywords or phrases indicating judicial treatment (e.g., followed, overruled, reversed) are present. The text describes legal principles on setting aside ex-parte decrees and appellate court duties but provides no information on how this case has been treated in subsequent decisions.
NEERJA REALTORS PVT. LTD. VS JANGLU (DEAD) THR. LR. - 2018 1 Supreme 379: No keywords or phrases indicating judicial treatment are present. The text states procedural rules for service of summons and remedies against ex-parte decrees but offers no evidence of subsequent judicial treatment.
Bhanu Kumar Jain VS Archana Kumar - 2005 1 Supreme 102: No keywords or phrases indicating judicial treatment are present. The text notes an "Important point" on remedies after dismissal of an application under Order IX Rule 13 CPC but contains no indicators of how this case has been treated by later courts.
(1) Grant of Succession Certificate by ex-parte order – Where an application is defective or material facts have been suppressed or misstated, certificate issued pursuant thereto is liable to be revo....
Succession Certificate – Courts are required to deal with application under Section 372 of Succession Act in a summary manner without asking for strict proof as contemplated under Indian Evidence Act....
judgment and decree passed by the learned First Appellate Court having come to the conclusion that the proceedings for obtaining Succession Certificate was defective and the Certificate was obtained ....
Mandatory disclosure of near relatives is essential for succession certificate applications under the Act.
The deposit of the sum under Section 379(1) of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, for the issuance of a Succession Certificate under Section 372 is not mandatory and does not affect the maintainability....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the proper consideration and application of the provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 and the Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827 in matters ....
Nominees under insurance policies do not hold beneficial interest; legal heirs must pursue civil suits for rights determination despite summary nature of succession certificate proceedings.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
