SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(SC) 438

PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, K. V. VISWANATHAN
Unchgaon Village Panchayat – Appellant
Versus
Kolhapur Municipal Corporation – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Amol B. Karande, AOR Mr. Ashutosh Srivastava, Adv. Mr. B Lakshmi Pallesh, Adv. Ms. Akshada, Adv. Mr. Jarnail Singh, Adv. M/S. S.M. Jadhav And Company, AOR
For the Respondent(s): Ms. Abha R. Sharma, AOR Mr. Shrirang B. Varma, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Dharmadhikari, Adv. Mr. Aaditya Aniruddha Pande, AOR Mr. Shrirang B. Varma, Adv. Mr. Atul Babasaheb Dakh, AOR Mr. Diganta Gogoi, Adv. Mr. Praveen Kumar Pandey, Adv. Mr. Vikram Singh Dogra, Adv. Mr. Amol B. Karande, AOR Mr. B Lakshmi Pallesh, Adv. Ms. Akshada, Adv. Mr. Ashutosh Srivastava, Adv. Mr. Jarnail Singh, Adv. Mr. Vatsalya Vigya, AOR Mr. Anand Dilip Landge, AOR Ms. Revati Pravin Kharde, Adv. Mr. Shreenivas Patil, Adv. Mr. Rahul Prakash Pathak, Adv. Mr. Vinay Navare, Sr. Adv. Mr. Yashodha Chandurkar, Adv. Ms. Manshi Jain, Adv. Ms. Abha R. Sharma, AOR

JUDGMENT :

PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, J.

1. Leave granted in S.L.P. (Civil) Nos. 10001 and 10532 of 2018.

2. These Appeals arise out of a dispute between the Unchgaon Village Panchayat1[For short ‘Panchayat’], Taluka Karveer, District Kolhapur and the Kolhapur Municipal Corporation2[For short ‘Corporation’] concerning the exercise of jurisdiction over certain lands situated in Village Uchgaon and the competence of a Civil Court to entertain a suit challenging the Corporation’s assertion that the said lands fall within municipal limits. The Panchayat had instituted a Regular Civil Suit No. 193 of 2013 seeking declaratory and injunctive relief against the Corporation’s proposed action pursuant to a public notice asserting such jurisdiction. The 3rd Joint Civil Judge3[For short ‘Civil Court’], Junior Division, Kolhapur, held that it possessed jurisdiction to entertain the suit and proceeded to grant interim injunction; however, vide impugned judgment dated 22.02.2018, the High Court of Judicature at Bombay4[For short ‘High Court’], in Civil Revision Application No. 962 of 2014, reversed that finding and held that the dispute could not be adjudicated by a Civil Court, inter alia observing tha

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top