SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(SC) 438

PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, K. V. VISWANATHAN
Unchgaon Village Panchayat – Appellant
Versus
Kolhapur Municipal Corporation – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Amol B. Karande, AOR Mr. Ashutosh Srivastava, Adv. Mr. B Lakshmi Pallesh, Adv. Ms. Akshada, Adv. Mr. Jarnail Singh, Adv. M/S. S.M. Jadhav And Company, AOR
For the Respondent(s): Ms. Abha R. Sharma, AOR Mr. Shrirang B. Varma, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Dharmadhikari, Adv. Mr. Aaditya Aniruddha Pande, AOR Mr. Shrirang B. Varma, Adv. Mr. Atul Babasaheb Dakh, AOR Mr. Diganta Gogoi, Adv. Mr. Praveen Kumar Pandey, Adv. Mr. Vikram Singh Dogra, Adv. Mr. Amol B. Karande, AOR Mr. B Lakshmi Pallesh, Adv. Ms. Akshada, Adv. Mr. Ashutosh Srivastava, Adv. Mr. Jarnail Singh, Adv. Mr. Vatsalya Vigya, AOR Mr. Anand Dilip Landge, AOR Ms. Revati Pravin Kharde, Adv. Mr. Shreenivas Patil, Adv. Mr. Rahul Prakash Pathak, Adv. Mr. Vinay Navare, Sr. Adv. Mr. Yashodha Chandurkar, Adv. Ms. Manshi Jain, Adv. Ms. Abha R. Sharma, AOR

Table of Content
1. overview of appeals from high court on civil jurisdiction. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. corporation's notice asserts jurisdiction over village lands. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
3. panchayat sues for declaration against municipal inclusion. (Para 9 , 10)
4. civil court upholds jurisdiction; grants interim injunction. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
5. high court reverses, holds civil court lacks jurisdiction. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)
6. panchayat argues no notification proves inclusion. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26)
7. corporation defends legislative extension bars civil suit. (Para 27 , 28 , 29)
8. jurisdiction hinges on substance of claimed reliefs. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33)
9. section 3 mmc act confers legislative municipal limits power. (Para 34 , 35)
10. mrtp act section 149 bars civil court challenges. (Para 36)
11. factual disputes do not confer civil jurisdiction. (Para 37 , 38)
12. belated challenges to historical inclusions barred by laches. (Para 39 , 40 , 41)
13. public law disputes not for civil court adjudication. (Para 42 , 43 , 44 , 45)
14. appeals dismissed upholding high court jurisdiction ruling. (Para 46 , 47 , 48)

JUDGMENT :

PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, J.

1. Leave gra

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top