IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
BHARGAV D. KARIA, J.
KARODIYA VILLAGE PANCHAYAT THROUGH SARPANCH - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT - Respondent
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7002 of 2020
With
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7003 of 2020
With
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7004 of 2020
With
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7326 of 2020
With
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8027 of 2020
With
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8138 of 2020
Decided On : 07-05-2021
Gujarat Panchayats Act, 1993 - Section 7 - Constitution of India, 1950 - Articles 226, 227 and 243Q - Gram panchayats – Constitution of Municipalities - Resolution - Property belonging to village panchayat including gamtal or gauchar land - Challenged order by respondent no.1 – Additional Chief Secretary, Urban Development and Urban Housing Department of State of Gujarat, as well as Resolution passed by Standing Committee of respondent no.3 – Vadodara Municipal Corporation (VMC), as well as, Resolution passed in General Meeting of respondent no.3 – VMC Petitions are more or less similar as petitioner panchayats have objected to be included within municipal limits of VMC and have challenged notification issued by State Government, petitions were heard analogously and are being disposed of by this common order
Finding of the court: On perusal of Article 243Q, it is clear that impugned order and notification dated 18th June, 2020 are issued after considering the factors relevant for inclusion of the petitioner village panchayats in the municipal area so as to provide municipal services after following due process by inviting favourable opinions of the Development Commissioner dated 10th January, 2020, as well as, the opinion dated 13th January, 2020 from the Collector, Vadodara. Respondent authorities have also considered that after deducting the area falling within the gram panchayats, approximately 15 sq. km. area has already been converted to non-agriculture use and the remaining area is also under process of being converted to for non-agriculture use and in order to develop such area and considering the development of outgrowth area on the peripheral boundary of the petitioner gram panchayats, which consists of almost 330 residential societies with other constructions of commercial nature and thereafter the impugned orders and notifications are passed to include such village panchayats into the limits of the VMC.
Result: Petition dismissed
JUDGMENT :
Heard learned advocate Mr. S.P. Majmudar appearing for the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader Mr. K.M. Antani for the respondent – State through video conference.
1. Rule returnable forthwith. Learned Assistant Government Pleader Mr. K.M. Antani waives service of notice of rule on behalf of the respondent – State. By consent of both the learned advocates for the parties, matters are taken-up for final hearing.
2. By these petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have challenged the order dated 30th March, 2020 passed by the respondent no.1 – Additional Chief Secretary, Urban Development and Urban Housing Department of the State of Gujarat, as well as the Resolution dated 8th August, 2019 passed by the Standing Committee of respondent no.3 – Vadodara Municipal Corporation (herein after referred to as 'the VMC'), as well as, Resolution dated 19th September, 2019 passed in General Meeting of the respondent no.3 – VMC. After filing of the petitions, the petitioners have amended the petitions and challenged the notification dated 18th June, 2020 whereby the petitioner Panchayats have been included within the limits of VMC.
3. As the facts of each of the petitions are more or less similar as the petitioner panchayats have objected to be included within the municipal limits of VMC and have challenged the notification issued by the State Government, the petitions were heard analogously and are being disposed of by this common order. The details of each of the petitions and corresponding village panchayat is as under :-
| Sr. No. | Special Civil Application number | Name of Village Panchayat |
| 1 | 7002 of 2020 | Karodiya Village Panchayat |
| 2 | 7003 of 2020 | Bill Gram Panchayat |
| 3 | 7004 of 2020 | Undera Village Panchayat |
| 4 | 7326 of 2020 | Sevasi Gram Panchayat |
| 5 | 8027 of 2020 | Residents of Bhayali Village |
| 6 | 8138 of 2020 | Vemali Village Panchayat |
| 7 | 10688 of 2020 and 10777 of 2020 | Residents of Segva Syadla Village Panvhayat |
3.1 In the general meeting of VMC, resolution dated 19th September, 2019 was passed to include these villages within the limits of the VMC.
3.2 The respondent no.1 – Urban Development and Urban Housing Department received a proposal dated 4th October, 2019 from the Municipal Commissioner of VMC with respect to inclusion of area of these villages into the limits of the VMC.
3.3 The petitioner gram panchayats raised objections by a detailed representation dated 23rd October, 2019 against the resolution dated 8th August, 2019 and 19th September, 2019 passed by the Standing Committee and in the General Meeting of the VMC.
3.4 The petitioner gram panchayats preferred Special Civil Applications before this Court with a prayer to direct the respondent – State to decide the objections dated 23rd October, 2019 and this Court vide order dated 22nd January, 2020 directed the respondent no.1 to decide the objections dated 23rd October, 2019 in accordance with law before 31st March, 2020. The Development Commissioner, tendered his opinion dated 10th January, 2020 to the panchayat – Rural Housing and Rural Development Department for inclusion of the petitioner gram panchayats into the limits of the VMC. The Deputy Collector, Vadodara also submitted an opinion for inclusion of the petitioner panchayats into the limits of VMC on 13th January, 2020. The Collector also vide opinion dated 15th January, 2020 endorsed the opinion of Deputy Collector and forwarded the same to the respondent no.1.
3.5 The petitioner gram panchayats were informed by letter dated 5th February, 2020
Shah Education Medical College Vs. Jamnagar Municipal Corporation reported in 2006 (2) GLH 198
Kantilal Dharamdas Kachoriya Vs. Chief Officer, Palanpur Nagarpalika
Junagadh Municipality Vs. State of Gujarat
SAMSHER SINGH V/S. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER
TULSIPUR SUGAR CO. LTD. V/s. THE NOTIFIED AREA COMMITTEE, TULSIPUR
SUNDARJAS KANYALAL BHATIJA AND OTHERS V/s. COLLECTOR, THANE, MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
STATE OF PUNJAB V/S. TEHAL SINGH AND OTHERS
Tulsipur Sugar Co. Ltd., Vs. The notified Area Committee, Tulsipur
Rameshchandra Kachardas Porwal & ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra & ors. reported in (1981) 2 SCC 722
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.