SANJAY KUMAR, K. VINOD CHANDRAN
Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu, and others Etc. – Appellant
Versus
S. Raja and others Etc. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
SANJAY KUMAR, J
1. In Special Leave Petition (C) Nos. 24430-24431 of 2019, officials of the Government of Tamil Nadu assailed the common order dated 25.09.2019 passed by a division bench of the Madras High Court in W.P. Nos. 11156 of 2018 and 24500 of 2019. Their limited grievance centred around the fact that the division bench had vacated the interim order of status quo which was passed in and remained subsisting during the pendency of W.P. No. 11156 of 2018, while passing the common order.
2. Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 26314 of 2019 was filed by Casagrand Builder Private Limited, aggrieved by the common order dated 25.09.2019 insofar as it pertained to its writ petition, viz., W.P. No. 24500 of 2019. Special Leave Petition (C) (Diary) No. 2594 of 2021 was filed by one C.E. Satyanarayana Reddy assailing the common order dated 25.09.2019 in relation to both the writ petitions.
3. By order dated 21.10.2019, while issuing notice in SLP (C) Nos. 24430-24431 of 2019, this Court directed status quo existing as on that date to be maintained by the parties. On 13.11.2019, this Court issued notice in SLP (Civil) No. 26314 of 2019 and tagged it with SLP (C) Nos. 24430-24431 of
Welfare state cannot reclaim government-allotted lands after decades upon creation of bona fide third-party interests including homes for innocent buyers; must provide basic amenities and act without....
The State Government does not have the power to review its own orders unless such power is specifically conferred by statute. The State Government cannot exercise its power of review after a long del....
The court reaffirmed that to obtain patta outside the scope of the Abolition Act, continuous possession must be proven, and unsubstantiated claims based on fraudulent documentation are untenable.
The court emphasized the necessity for governmental compliance with prior court orders concerning land assignment, asserting that logged records must accurately reflect legal ownership.
The judgment emphasizes the importance of adhering to principles of natural justice and providing a reasonable opportunity for the parties to present their case.
The court ruled that inordinate delay and lack of diligence by petitioners preclude the exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution in land acquisition matters.
The court affirmed that lands designated as Shamlat deh cannot be claimed by lessees post lease expiry, emphasizing the distinction between lease and allotment under the Punjab Village Common Lands A....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that once the Settlement Officer's order reached finality, issuing Patta for the same land on different grounds is not sustainable in the eye of la....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.