L. Ramesh vs State of Andhra Pradesh

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2021 Supreme(AP) 378

M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
L. Ramesh – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
Sri S.S.Prasad, learned senior counsel, appearing on behalf of Sri Sudhakar Rao Ambati, learned counsel for the petitioners, for the Appellant; Sri Ponnavolu Sudhakar Reddy, learned Additional Advocate General, Sri P.Yugandhar Reddy, learned Assistant Government Pleader, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

L.Ramesh and 15 others filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India questioning the action of respondent No.1 in issuing Memo No.26086/Lands-VIII/2020 dated 16.03.2020, whereby the memo issued by the Government bearing No.26086- A/EA and AR/A1/2013 dated 16.11.2017 was withdrawn without giving any notice to the petitioners as illegal, arbitrary, against the principles of natural justice and violative of Article 300-A of the Constitution of India.

2. The case of the petitioners is that they are title holder/owners and possessors of land in different extents in different survey numbers situated at Erragunta and Karakambadi villages, Renigunta Mandal, Chittoor District, which are as under.

Sl. No.	Petitioner	Village	Survey No.	Extent Ac.Cts	1-B Form/ Doc.
1	L.Ramesh 1st Petitioner	Erragunta Karakambadi	167, 168 and its sub-divisions 340,341,342 and its sub- divisions	4-06 5-46	1-B Form (ROR)
2	L.Mahesh 2nd petitioner	Erragunta Karakambadi	168 and its sub- divisions, 341 and its sub-divisions	0-78 2-86	1-B Fo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2021 Supreme(AP) 378

M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHYL. Ramesh – AppellantVersusState of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent

Cases Referred (21)

M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
L. Ramesh – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent