SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(SC) 458

PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, ALOK ARADHE
Lucknow Public School, Eldico – Appellant
Versus
State Of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Vivek Singh, AOR Ms. Saumya Sarasawat, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

1. Delay condoned.

2. This is yet another occasion for us to reiterate the constitutional and statutory obligation of a ‘neighbourhood school’ to give admission to students forwarded by the State Government without any delay. Such an obligation is consistent with the constitutional philosophy1[Article 21A], Section 12 of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 20092[Hereinafter referred to as ‘RTE Act, 2009’], as well as Rule 8 of the U.P Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Rules, 20113[Hereinafter referred to as the ‘UP RTE Rules, 2011’]. For the reasons to follow, we have affirmed the direction of the High Court to grant admission to the respondent without any delay.

3. The facts leading to filing of the present Special Leave Petition are that the respondent no. 5 (‘student’) applied to the Basic Education Department, State of Uttar Pradesh, for admission into pre-primary class in a neighbourhood school in accordance with the procedure prescribed under UP RTE Rules, 2011 for the year 2024-25. The student was duly selected, and the published list containing her name was sent to the petitioner school for admission into the pre-primary cl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top