IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
ARUN BHANSALI, C.J., VIKAS BUDHWAR, J.
Master Arjeet Pratap Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of U.P., Through Its Principal Secretary, Department Of Basic Education And Others – Respondents
Special Appeal No. 368 Of 2024
Decided On : 28-05-2024
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Shri Rajat Aren, learned counsel for appellant-writ petitioner, Shri Ramanand Pandey, learned Standing Counsel for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 and Shri Abrar Ahmad, counsel for Respondent No. 5.
2. This intra court appeal is against the judgment and order dated 02.04.2024 passed in Writ-C No. 9514 of 2024 (Master Arjeet Pratap Singh v. State of U.P. and 4 Others) whereby though the order dated 26.02.2024 of Block Education Officer, Block-Moradabad, Moradabad denying the admission of the writ petitioner in Pre-Nursery Class in Aryans International School, Plot No. 2 Majholi Road, Budhdhi Vihar, Moradabad for the academic sessions 2024-25 was set aside, however, instead of ordering for admission, a direction was issued to consider the application form of the appellant-writ petitioner in the institution in question after consideration of all the applications of ward no. 16.
3. The case of the appellant-writ petitioner as projected before the learned Single Judge was that the appellant-writ petitioner, Master Arjeet Pratap Singh born on 23.03.2020 is a minor within the meaning of Section 3 of the Indian Majority Act, 1875 who is the resident of ward no. 15, District-Moradabad. The writ petitioner further claims that he belongs to scheduled caste category and his disabled father’s monthly income is meagre Rs. 6,000/- per month. Armed with the said certificates, the writ petitioner applied for being granted admission in Pre-Nursery in Aryans International School, Moradabad situate at ward no. 16 purported to be under the provisions of the Right to Education (RTE) Act, 2009. A lottery for allotment of the school is stated to have been conducted on 26.02.2024 wherein the request of the writ petitioner was not acceded to and the same was rejected with the following remarks:
4. Questioning the order dated 26.02.2024 passed by the Block Education Officer, Block-Moradabad, Moradabad, the writ petitioner preferred Writ-C No. 9514 of 2024 which on contest came to be decided on 02.04.2024 wherein in para 12 to 16, it was observed as under:
13. In the guidelines dated 25.07.2011 issued by Government of India “neighbourhood school” has been defined as “a school located within the defined limits or area of neighbourhood, as notified by State Government under State RTE Rules”. In said guidelines, it has also been noted that there is no compulsion on the child to seek admission only in the school in his or her neighbourhood, i.e., a child can always apply in other Schools also subject to relevant rules and provisions.
14. The basic concept of “neighbourhood school” is to accommodate maximum children under RTE Act having residence near to School subject to quota prescribed so that it would be convenient for them for to-and-fro journey, but it does not mean that a student residing far away from School cannot apply as it may be a case that he can manage to-and-fro journey by his/her own means. The concept of neighbourhood school also prescribes that maximum students be accommodated in their neighbourhood schools and for that State Government
Ajay Kumar Patel v. State of U.P. and another reported in 2016 (4) ADJ 662
Shree Chamundi Mopeds Ltd. v. Church of South India Trust Association
Ramesh Chandra Sankla & Ors. v. Vikram Cement & Ors. (2008) 14 SCC 58
The right to education under the RTE Act does not guarantee admission to a specific school, and residency criteria based on wards must be clarified by the State.
The Right to Education Act aims to ensure educational access for underprivileged children, and rigid adherence to distance criteria that denies admission contradicts this purpose.
The specific application, shortlisting, and allocation process by the Directorate of Education are essential for EWS student admissions, and without these, there is no enforceable right to seek admis....
The Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 guarantees every child's right to education, and administrative decisions regarding admission must be based on clear and justifiable g....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of siblings to points under the 'sibling category' for admission in a recognized private un-aided school, emphasizing the importanc....
The failure to comply with directives issued by the Education Department prior to obtaining minority status cannot condone default in admitting students under the Right to Education Act, 2009.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.