S. V. N. BHATTI, PRASANNA B. VARALE
Dharmendra Kalra – Appellant
Versus
Kulvinder Singh Bhatia – Respondent
JUDGMENT
PRASANNA B VARALE, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. The present special leave petition was filed under Article 136 of the Constitution of India against the impugned judgment and final orders dated 10.12.2024 passed by the Hon'ble High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Case: S.C.C. Revision No.114 of 2023 and CMA No. 6 of 2025 in S.C.C. Revision No. 114 of 2023 whereby the Hon'ble High Court was pleased to allow the revision petition of the tenant against the judgment of the Ld. Trial court - striking off the defence of the tenant on the ground of violation of the mandatory provisions of Order XV Rule 5 Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter referred to as ‘CPC’) and thereafter allowing the application seeking extension of time filed by the respondent herein.
BRIEF FACTS:
3. The fathers of the Appellants namely, Sh. Uttam Chand Kalra and Sh. Sain Das Kalra purchased suit premises no. 118/1-A Kaushalpuri, Kanpur Nagar from the erstwhile owner Shri Surendra Nigam son of Shri Laxmi Narayan Nigam, through a registered sale deed registered in the office of Sub-Registrar Kanpur Nagar. The respondents occupied two halls on the ground admeasuring 27’ 3’’ * 13 and 20” * 17’6” as a tenant at the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.