SANJAY KAROL, VIPUL M. PANCHOLI
New India Assurance Company Limited – Appellant
Versus
Dolly Satish Gandhi – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SANJAY KAROL J.
Leave Granted.
THE APPEAL
2. ‘A’ met with an accident. They filed a claim before the jurisdictional Tribunal i.e., Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal1[MACT] seeking compensation in which inter alia, loss of income, future prospects, special diet, transportation and medical expenses have been claimed for. Simultaneously, claims set out with insurance under the claim of medical insurance for the very same medical expenses are allowed and money received. Is it legally permissible for the MACT to account for such amounts received, and as such deduct the same or not, is the question involved herein.
3. A Bench of three Judges of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in deciding a conflict between judgments of the said Court, namely The New India Assurance v. Dineshchandra Shantilal Shah and Ors, (2013) 09 BOM CK 0240 (First Appeal No.657 of 2013), on the one hand, and Vrajesh Navnitlal Desai v. K. Bagyam and Anr., 2005 SCC OnLine Bom 156, Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co. Ltd., Kolkata v. Ajit Chandrakant Rakvi and Anr., 2019 SCC OnLine Bom 496, on the other, in terms of the impugned judgment, held that the amount received by a claimant by way of his own Medicl
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.