SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Bom) 473

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
A.S. Chandurkar, Milind N. Jadhav, Gauri Godse, JJ
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Dolly Satish Gandhi – Respondent


Advocate Appeared:
Mr. Deelip R. Mahadik with Mr. Devendra Joshi, Advocate for the Appellant-Original Insurer.
Mr. T.J. Mendon with Mr. T.R. Kale, Mr. Deepak S. Kilaje, Mr. Navin Sheth and Mr. R.S. Alange, Advocates for Respondent No.1.
Mr. Vineet B. Naik, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Sukand Kulkarni, i/by Mr. Sarthak Diwan, Advocates for M/s. HDFC Ergo General Insurance
Company Ltd. Mr. Gautam Ankhad, Senior Advocate, Amicus Curiae, with Ms. Samridhi
Lodha and Ms. Minal Thakker,

Judgement Key Points

What is the answer to whether amounts received under a Mediclaim/Medical Insurance Policy are deductible from the compensation awarded under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act? What is the correct legal reasoning for the deduction or non-deduction of mediclaim amounts from medical expenses under the MV Act? What are the implications of the Full Bench decision for future cases involving mediclaim deductions under the MV Act?

What is the answer to whether amounts received under a Mediclaim/Medical Insurance Policy are deductible from the compensation awarded under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act?

What is the correct legal reasoning for the deduction or non-deduction of mediclaim amounts from medical expenses under the MV Act?

What are the implications of the Full Bench decision for future cases involving mediclaim deductions under the MV Act?


JUDGMENT

Per A.S. Chandurkar, J.

1. The question placed for consideration before this larger Bench is “Whether the amount received by a Claimant under a Mediclaim Policy or under a Medical Insurance Policy is liable to be deducted from the amount of compensation payable to a Claimant under the head “Medical Expenses” in proceedings under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 ?”

Decision leading to the Reference :

2. In First Appeal No.1344 of 2014 (The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Mrs. Dolly Satish Gandhi and Anr.), a challenge has been raised to the judgment of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Mumbai awarding monetary compensation to the claimant. One of the grounds of challenge is that the amount awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (for short, “Tribunal”) towards medical expenses could not have been so awarded in view of the fact that the claimant had received these expenses under a Mediclaim Policy from the Insurance Company.

3. When the First Appeal was heard, amongst other decisions, the judgment in First Appeal No.657 of 2013 (The New India Assurance Vs. Dineshchandra Shantilal Shah and Ors.), decided on 19th September 2013 taking the view that the amount re

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top