SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Kar) 651

HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
S. Hanumanthappa, S/o Sri. Sanjeevappa – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :SRI. RAVISHANKAR C.R, ADVOCATE
For the Respondent:SRI. THYAGARAJA S, ADVOCATE

JUDGMENT :

This appeal is filed under Section-173(1), of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as ‘MV Act’ for brevity) by the appellant/insurance company, challenging the judgment and award dated 22.03.2013, passed in MVC No.3314/2009, on the file of Special XI Additional Judge and MACT, at Bangalore (SCCH-12) (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Tribunal’ for brevity).

2. The accident occurred, the injuries sustained and the liability of the insurance company are not in dispute.

3. The question to be considered in this appeal is whether once the claimant has got reimbursement of the medical expenses under the Mediclaim Policy, can be awarded once again under the medical expenses and hospitalisation charges, while determining compensation under the MV Act.

4. In the present case, the Tribunal has awarded compensation under various heads as follows:

Sl. No.

 

Amount in Rs.

1

Pain and suffering

50,000-00

2

Loss of income during treatment period

16,000-00

3

Medical expenses

5,24,639-00

4

Loss of future earning

43,200-00

5

Loss of amenities

10,000-00

6

Attendant charges, conveyance, nourishment and diet etc.

10,000-00

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top