O. MANOHAR REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THE Counsel representing the revision petitioner, and Sri Veera Reddy, the Counsel representing the respondent.

( 2 ) THE landlord-5. Suresh Babu aggrieved by the reversing order made in c. M. A. No. 5/2000 on the file of Senior civil Judge, Nandyal, which was preferred as against the order of eviction made in r. C. C. No. 2/97 on the file of Rent controller-cum-Principal Junior Civil Judge, nandyal, had preferred the present C. R. P. The ground on which the landlord filed eviction petition against the tenant is bona fide personal requirement of the landlord. The learned Rent Controller recorded the evidence of P. Ws. 1 and 2 and R. Ws. 1 to 4, and marked Exs. B. l to B. 15 and ultimately came to the conclusion that the landlord requires the premises bona fide and ordered eviction. Aggrieved by the same, the respondent herein-the tenant in the aforesaid R. C. C. , filed C. M. A. No. 5/2000, which was reversed by the Appellate authority-cum-Senior Civil Judge, Nandyal. Hence, the present C. R. P.

( 3 ) SRI O. Manohar Reddy, the learned Counsel representing the revision petitioner, had taken this Court through the respective pleadings of the parties, the ev

Click Here to Read the rest of this document