C.V.RAMULU
Mir Bazlay All – Appellant
Versus
Jagirdar Nirkhy Mir mahammad Ali – Respondent
( 2 ) THE appellant is the defendant. Respondent No. 1 is the plaintiff (since died and respondents 2 to 5 were brought on record as his legal representatives), who filed the suit in O. S. No. 860 of 1997 seeking permanent injunction restraining the defendant and his men from interfering with his peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule property. The parties are bereinatter referred to as they are arrayed in the suit.
( 3 ) IT is Ihe case of the original plaintiff that out of the suit schedule property of 248 square yards, his father purchased 225 square yards under a registered sale deed dated 25-2-1936 from one Sakala mutyam. Himself along with his brother were owning the property adjoining from north to south and a partition was effected bet
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.