SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(AP) 35

N.V.RAMANA
S. Lingamaiah – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


N. V. RAMANA, J.

( 1 ) INVOKING the extraordinary jurisdiction of this court under Article 226 of the constitution of India, the petitioner has filed this writ petition, praying for the following reliefs:to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandmus declaring the Notice no. C/268/93, dated 2-9-1993, issued by the Mandal Revenue Officer, golconda, Hyderabad, as well as all further steps taken thereon, as illegal, null, void, without jurisdiction and violative of Articles 14,19,21 and 300- a of the Constitution of India and to set aside the same, and grant such other reliefs which the petitioner may ultimately be found to be entitled to, in the circumstances of the case. FACTUAL MATRIX OF THE MATTER

( 2 ) IN the affidavit, filed along with the writ petition, it is stated by the petitioner that he is the owner and possessor of an extent of ac. 1-20 guntas of dry land in Sy. No. 102/1 of hakeempet village, Golconda Mandal, hyderabad, in Ward No. 12, Block a , Town survey No. 14/1, that prior to him the said land was in the possession of his father and grandfather, that the source of title was lost in antiquity, and that he had perfected his
























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top