SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(AP) 411

N.Y.HANUMANTHAPPA, A.GOPAL REDDY
Goundla Venkaiah – Appellant
Versus
Mandal Revenue Officer, Sherlingampally Mandal – Respondent


( 1 ) THIS writ petition is filed challenging the order passed by the Special Court under a. P. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982 in LGA No. 41/97, dated 18-8-1998 confirming the order passed by the Special tribunal-cum-District Judge, Ranga Reddy in OP No. 421/90, dated 27-5-1997.

( 2 ) THE respondent-State filed application under the Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982 before the Special Tribunal against the petitioners herein for recovery of possession of the schedule land after evicting the petitioners herein and for awarding compensation and profits and other reliefs and also to initiate criminal proceedings against the petitioners herein under the provisions of the Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act.

( 3 ) A few facts, which are necessary to dispose of this writ petition are as follows: according to the State, as per the information furnished in the revenue records of Khanament village bearing s. No. 42 measuring Ac. 18-19 guntas was classified as Kharis Khata Sarkari and it is a government land. One Sri Gondla mallaiah, the father of the petitioners herein illegally grabbed the land of an extent of ac. 5. 00 situated in S. No. 42 at Khanament village without entitlement a



































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top