SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(AP) 1071

GODA RAGHURAM, P.S.NARAYANA, BILAL NAZKI
Girish Sarwate – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


BILAL NAZKI, J.

( 1 ) THIS matter has come before this Court on reference by a division Bench of this Court. The reference of the Division Bench is a result of reference by a Single Judge. The question which needs to be answered is whether the High Court is empowered under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short "cr. P. C") to quash the First Information Report (FIR ).

( 2 ) THERE are four judgments of this court. The first one and the earliest in point of time is Hasan All Khan v. State of A. P. , 1992 (1) ALT 146. The second one is s. Sarat Babu Chowdary v. Inspector of police, 1992 (3) ALT 454 (DB ). The third one is Pearl Beverages Limited v. State of a. P. , 2000 (2) ALD (Crl.) 32 (AP) and the last judgment is Gudavalli Murali Krishna and others v. Gudavalli Madhavi, 2001 (1) ald (Crl.) 689 (AP ). In Hasan All s case (supra) this Court held that powers under section 482 Cr. P. C can be exercised by high Court only after initiation of criminal proceedings after a charge-sheet is filed and not at the stage of investigation. In Sarat babu s case (supra) the Division Bench held that High Court does not possess any power to quash FIR under Section 482 Cr. P. C. In







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top