SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(AP) 1517

V.V.S.RAO
B. Rajamani – Appellant
Versus
Azhar Sultana – Respondent


V. V. S. RAO, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is preferred by the sixth defendant in O. S. No. 1436 of 1981 on the file of the Court of I Additional judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. By judgment and decree impugned in the appeal, the Trial Court directed Respondents 2 to 4 herein and appellant herein to execute and register sale deed in respect of plaint schedule property in favour of the first respondent herein. The appellant is a subsequent purchaser of the property under registered sale deed from Ramesh chand Khanna, the predecessor of respondents 2 to 4. In this appeal for the sake of convenience, the parties shall be referred to as they are arrayed in the suit.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff filed the suit for specific performance of the agreement of sale, dated 4. 12. 1978 in respect of property bearing Municipal No. 4-1-1 admeasuring 220 square yards situated at King Koti, hyderabad. Her allegations in the plaint in brief are as follows. The first defendant ramesh Chand Khanna represented in december 1978 that he purchased the suit schedule plot with a room under registered sale deed from Private Estate of His Exalted highness the Nizam VII and wanted to dispose of the same. Accordingly he execu






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top