SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(AP) 941

S.B.SINHA, V.V.S.RAO
J. Purushotham – Appellant
Versus
District Collector, Prakasam Dist. , Ongole – Respondent


V. V. S. RAO, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner is a resident of Budavada village in Cheemakurthi Mandal of prakasam District. He claims to be one of the voters of the said village. His grievance is that respondents 1 to 3 did not reserve any wards in the said village for candidates belonging to SCs though there are 300 SC voters in the village. Therefore, he seeks a writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to reserve seats/wards in buduvada Gram Panchayat to SCs. He also challenges Article 243-O of the Constitution of India as ultra vires the basic structure of the Constitution.

( 2 ) IN the affidavit accompanying the writ Petition the petitioner states that there were 2037 voters in the village during the assembly elections. During the last Gram panchayat elections one ward was reserved for SC candidate and two for BCs. For the gram Panchayat elections-2001 the respondents have reserved two wards for bcs, but they have not reserved any ward for SC (General) or SC (Women) categories. The petitioner contends that as per Andhra pradesh Panchayat Raj (Reservation of Seats and Offices of Gram Panchayats, Mandal parishads and Zilla Parishads) Rules, 2001 (hereinafter called rese















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top