SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(AP) 1100

T.CH.SURYA RAO
G. S. R. Somayaji – Appellant
Versus
State through CBI – Respondent


T. SURYA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner assails the order dated 28-6-2001 passed by the learned Special Judge for C. B. I. cases, Hyderabad, in Cri. M. P. No. 148 of 2000 in C. C. No. 17 of 1999.

( 2 ) THE petitioner is the accused in C. C. No. 17 of 1999 filed by the C. B. I. for the alleged offence punishable under Section 13 (1) (d) read with Section 13 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 ( the Act, 1988 for brevity ).

( 3 ) THE factual matrix germane in the context for better understanding of the matter and for eventual adjudication may be stated thus : The petitioner accused has been working as Regional Chief, Housing and Urban Development Corporation Limited, a concern totally owned by the Government of India. Basing on a complaint dated 27-6-1998 received from one Dr. C. Suresh against the petitioner, a case in Crime No. 10/acb-CR/98 had been registered by the Anti Corruption Bureau of the State of Andhra Pradesh and the agency laid a trap against him. The trap was successful and the bribe amount of Rs. 4,00,000/- said to have been received by the petitioner when offered by the complainant on demand by the petitioner was recovered. Thereupon under a letter No. 83/rct

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top