SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(AP) 337

P.VENKATRAMA REDDY, R.M.BAPAT
Govt of A. P. Revenue (U. C. I. ) Department – Appellant
Versus
A. V. Papayya Sastry – Respondent


P. VENKATARAMA REDDI, J.

( 1 ) THESE writ appeals by the State government (Revenue Department) and by vishakapatnam Port Trust are preferred against two separate judgments of the learned single Judge in Writ Petition no. 3102 of 1995 and W. P. No. 11754 of 1994. Writ Appeal Nos. 109 and 479 of 1997 are preferred against the judgment in Writ petition No. 3102 of 1995 and the remaining two writ appeals arise out of the order in w. P. No. 11754 of 1994. W. P. No. 11754 of 1994 was filed by the respondents 1 to 7 herein who claim to be having right and interest over the land in S. No. 3/1, 3/2 and 4 of Kancherlapalem (extension) village within the municipal limits of vishakapatnam. They sought for a direction to the Land Acquisition Officer to pass an award in pursuance of the notification dated 17-5-1991 issued under Section 4 (1) of the Land Acquisition Act. W. P. No. 3102 of 1995 was filed by the same parties seeking a writ of Certiorari to quash the order of the government in G. O. Ms. No. 21 (Revenue uc-1) dt. 20-1-1995. Both the writ petitions were allowed. In W. P. No. 11754 of 1994, the learned single Judge directed a fresh notification under Section 4 (1) to be published and a
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top