SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(AP) 455

G.BIKSHAPATHY, P.VENKATRAMA REDDY
M. Gangareddy – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


P. VENKATARAMA REDDI, J.

( 1 ) THESE appeals and revision petition arise out of an award dated 9-3-1989 madeby the arbitrator as modified by the IV Additional Judge, City Civil Court, by his Judgment dated 25-6-1990. The State of Andhra Pradesh represented by the Superintending Engineer, I and CAD (Godavary Valley Circle) filed O. P. No. 395/1989 under Sections 30 and 33 of the Arbitration Act to set aside the award to the extent the claims were allowed. The O. P. was partly allowed by the iv Additional Judge, City Civil Court. Against that, C. M. A. No. 357/1991 was filed by the respondent in the O. P. (hereinafter referred to as the contractor or claimant ). The claimant filed O. P. No. 175/1989 under Sections 30 and 33 to set aside the award insofar as it went againsthim. That O. P. wasdismissed. Against the Judgment in O. P. No. 175/1989, the contractor filed C. M. A. No. 640/1991 and the State of A. P. has filed C. M. A. No. 236/1991. The contractor also filed o. S. No. 546/1989 under Section 14 to 17 of the Arbitrator Act for filing of the award passed by the arbitrator (D-3 in the suit) and to make it a rule of the Court and to pass a decree in terms there of. The suit w





























































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top