SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(AP) 545

R.M.BAPAT, P.VENKATRAMA REDDY
B. Narasimha Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Revenue Divisional Officer (L. A. O. ), Nalgonda – Respondent


P. VENKATARAMA REDDI, J.

( 1 ) THIS Letters Patent Appeal is preferred against the judgment in Appeal no. 347/84 filed by the respondent herein under Section 54 of the Land acquisition Act questioning the award made by the learned Subordinate Judge, nalgonda, in O. P. 31 /82 on a reference under Sec. 18 of the act.

( 2 ) AN extent of Ac. 6-00 of land belonging to the appellants in Survey No. 493 situate at Nakrekal village, Nalgonda district was acquired under the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act for the purpose of providing house-sites to poor. The notification under Section 4 (1) of the Act was published in the nalgonda District Gazette on 25-10-1977. The Land Acquisition Officer passed the award on 26-8-1981 fixing the compensation at the rate of Rs. 2,000/- per acre. The appellants protested and sought reference to the civil court. Appellants claimed compensation to be awarded at the rate of Rs. 30/- per sq. yard. Two agreements of sale and two registered sale-deeds were relied upon before the reference Court by the claimants as furnishing proof of comparable sale value of the land acquired. The learned Subordinate Judge placed reliance only on Ex. A-5 which is a register














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top