SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(AP) 724

S.V.MARUTHI
M. Premanandam – Appellant
Versus
Regional Manager, State Bank of India, Regional Office, vijayawada – Respondent


S. V. MARUTHI, J.

( 1 ) THE question involved in this writ petition is what is the effect of judgment in W. P. No. 5924/85 dated 21-9-1988. It arises under the following circumstances: the petitioner was appointed as clerk-cum-Cashier in the State Bank of India, kollur. On 16-11-1984 a notice was issused to him stating that in the attestation form dt: 23-7-1984 submitted by him, he did not mention that he was remanded to judicial custody on 17-7-1984 and that he was employed in the office of the Regional provident Fund Commissioner, Guntur and he was asked to submit his explanation for suppressing the above facts. He made a representation on 21-11-1984 seeking one week time for submitting his explanation. However, without waiting for the explanation, the first respondent terminated the service of the petitioner by his proceedings dated 23-11-1984. The petitioner filed a representation on 10-4-1985 stating that the allegations made are not correct; that he was not taken into custody either by the police or under the orders of the court and that when he heard that he was implicated in a criminal case, he voluntarily went to the court on 17-7-1984 and executed a bond with sureties for



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top