SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(AP) 55

A.RAGHUVIR, P.KODANDA RAMAYYA
Mannam Thirupathiswamy – Appellant
Versus
A. P. WAKF BOARD, M. FAZNLLAH SHERIFF – Respondent


KODANDARAMAYYA, J.

( 1 ) THE main point for determination in these appeals is whether the Inam grants in question constitute wakf property within the meaning of the Wakf act 29 of 1954; (herein after called the act ).

( 2 ) THE Andhra Pradesh Wakf board is the plaintiff in 0 S No. 63/67 on the file of the Subordinate Judge s court, Ongole for the recovery of plaint schedule property consisting of two items situated in Pernamitta and Kolachanakota villages of an extent of Acs. 18-88 cents and Acs. 8-96 cents respectively. The plaint case is that the property in question was endowed for the support and service of Ashurkhana in the village of Ongole and the defendents are the alienees of the wakf property and the plaintiff is entitled to recover the property as the alienations are void.

( 3 ) THE defence is that the property in question is not wakf prpperty but they are personal inams granted to the ancestor of the defendant s vendors and they also perfected their title by adverse possession and hence the suit is liable to be dismissed.

( 4 ) THIS suit is tried along with 0 S No. 300/70 filed by one Syed Ali who claims to be the descendent of the original grantee. The subject matter o






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top