SEETHARAM REDDY
Kadimcherla Sobhanadri – Appellant
Versus
Manga Ramadas – Respondent
( 2 ) THE petitioners herein are the tenants. The 2nd respondent herein filed I. A. No. 435 of 1978 in R. C. C. No. 87 of 1974 to add her as the 2nd petitioner in the main R. C. C. under Order 1, rule 1c and section 131, Civil Procedure code. That petition was filed on the basis that pending the main R. C. C. she purchased the premises in question and, therefore, she would like to be added as the 2nd petitioner for the purpose of evicting the respondents-tenants from the said premises. An objection was raised by the petitioners herein stating that Order 1, rule 10 has no application and the Rent Control Court has no jurisdiction to allow the said I. A. The Rent Controller allowed the application holding that Order J, rule 10 and section 151, civil Procedure Code, are applicable to the case on hand. Aggrieved by the said order, the peti
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.