SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(AP) 112

P.CHANDRA REDDY, MUNI KANNIAH, N.KUMARAYYA
Mudragada Satyanarayana – Appellant
Versus
Jammi Veerraju – Respondent


( 1 ) RESPONDENT No. 7, Viramma, transferred the suit lands to the appellant through a sale deed, dated 19-3-1950. Respondents 1 to 6 filed a suit O. S. 10 of 1950 in the District Court of East Godavary at Rajahmundry for declaration that the sale deed Ex. B-2 dated 19-3-1950 executed by respondent 1 in favour of the appellant was not valid and binding on them. This suit of the respondents has been decreed by the Principal Subordinate Judge the alienee has now come up in appeal.

( 2 ) THE brief facts are: One Jammi Rayudu, the original ancestor of the plaintiff-respondents 1 to 6s family had three sons, Baliah, Narsiah and Appanna. Baliah had three sons by name Rayudu, father of respondents 1 to 4, Viraswamy, father of respondents 5 and 6 and Somanna, 7th plaintiff and 6th respondent herein. Jammi Rayudu acquired extensive lands including the suit lands. On the death of Rayudu, the suit lands and other remaining properties devolved on his three- sons, Balaiah, Narsiah, and Appanna who constituted a joint Hindu family. Appanna died 50 years ago un-divided and intestate leaving behind him his widow Baganima. Narsiah also died in about 1904 undivided and intestate leaving behind him h































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top