SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(AP) 1512

P.S.NARAYANA
P. Raghu Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Special Officer, Municipality, Bhadrachalam Khammam Dsitrict – Respondent


ORDER

All these Writ Petitions are coming up for admission to-day. Notice Before Admission had been ordered and status quo for a limited period was granted, which is being extended from time to time. In Writ Petition Nos.1 0055, 10136,10137, 10223 of 2006, 4th respondent came on record on the ground that at his instance and on his representation only, the present impugned action had been initiated and hence he must also be given opportunity of hearing in these Writ Petitions before passing an order. It is stated that in Writ Petition No.1 0274 of 2006 also the facts are similar and in fact the implead application and vacate application were already moved, and further submissions are made that inasmuch as the facts are similar, the said Writ Petition also can be disposed of.

2. These Writ Petitions are filed for a Writ of Mandamus declaring the respective notices dated 3.5.2006 issued by the 1st respondent as arbitrary, unreasonable, illegal and violative of principles of natural justice, violative of provisions of A.P. Municipalities Act and also violative of Articles 14, 19,21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and further issue such other suitable directions.

3. The facts are al






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top