On 10.8.1998 this Court made the following order:

“This appeal is admitted to consider the following question of law:

Whether the appellate Court is correct in reversing the judgment and decree of the trial Court having held that Bapanamma had no pre-existing interest and as such Section 14 (1) of the Hindu Succession Act does not apply and consequently dismissed the plaintiff’s suit on the ground that the impugned sale deeds were executed by the plaintiff’s father for legal necessity, which fact is neither pleaded nor proved in the case on the basis of the material on record.”

2) Sri G. Krishna Murthy, learned counsel representing the appellant had pointed out that apart from the said substantial question of law on the strength of which the second appeal was admitted the following substantial questions of law also would arise for consideration:

(1) Whether the sale deed executed by Bapanamma relating to item No.1 can be said to be valid and binding as she got only life interest?

(2) Whether the transactions made by such a life interest holder to be treated as void transactions?

(3) Whether the sale deed dated 10.3.1966 executed by the said Bapanamma and the father of th