M.A.C.M.A.M.P.No.3547/2009 is filed by the vacate petitioners -respondents 1 to 3 to vacate the interim stay granted by this Court in M.A.C.M.A.M.P.No.1470/2009. When the vacate application is came up for hearing before this Court, the Counsel on record Sri V.Sambasiva Rao and Sri U.P.Rao, made a request for disposal of the M.A.C.M.A. itself finally. Hence, the same was heard finally by this Court with the consent of the Counsel on record.

2. Sri Sambasiva Rao, the learned Counsel representing the appellant - 2nd respondent in O.P.No.2206/2007 on the file of XXII Additional Chief Judge -cum - Before the Motor Accidents claims Tribunal, City Criminal Court at Hyderabad (hereinafter referred to as 'the Tribunal below') would maintain that the Judgment and Decree made by the Tribunal below cannot be sustained. The learned Counsel pointed out that the compensation awarded by the Tribunal below is excessive. The learned Counsel also pointed out to the oral and documentary evidence available on record and would maintain that at the relevant point of time, these being minors, and inasmuch as, there was contributory negligence on the part of the deceased also, the awarding of co