K.C.BHANU
Regu Maheswara Rao – Appellant
Versus
Vhyricherla Kishore Chandra Surayanarayana Deo – Respondent
This petition is filed under Section 81 r/w Section 5 (a), 100 (1)(a) and (d) (i) of the Representation of the People, Act, 1951 (for short 'the Act 1951') to declare the election of the 1st respondent to 18 Araku Lok Sabha (S.T.) Parliamentary Constituency to be void and set aside the same and further direct the respondent No.12 to initiate proceedings for recovery of amount from 1st respondent for the period enjoyed by him as Member of Lok Sabha.
2. Brief facts, that are necessary for disposal of the present petition may be delineated as follows:
The election petitioner is challenging the election of 1st respondent to 18 Araku Lok Sabha (S.T.) Parliamentary Constituency. The election to the said Parliamentary Constituency was held on 16-04-2009 and 1st respondent was fielded from Indian National Congress Party. Respondents 2 to 11 are the other contesting candidates from different parties and as independents. The results of the said election was declared on 16-05-2009 and in the said election, the 1st respondent was declared elected as Member of Lok Sabha from 18 Araku Lok Sabha (S.T.) Parliamentary Constituency. The election petitioner is a registered voter and an elector
P.C. Purushothama Reddiar v. S. Perumal: AIR 1972 SC 608. (Para 39)
Ramji Dayawala and Sons (P) Ltd v. Invest Import: (1981) 1 SCC 80. (Para 40)
Madholal Sindhu v. Asian Assurance Co. Ltd. and others: AIR 1954 Bom. 305. (Para 41)
Rangayyan and another v. Innasimuthu Mudali and others: AIR 1956 Mad. 226. (Para 42)
Nagubhai Ammal and others v. B.Shama Rao and others: AIR 1956 SC 593. (Para 43)
Mahanti Shri Srinivas Ramanuj Das v. Surjanarayan Das and another: AIR 1967 SC 256. (Para 44)
Bala Shankar Maha Shankar Bhattjee and others v Charity Commissioner
M. Chandra v M. Thangamuthyu and another: (2010) 9 SCC 712. (Para 48)
Umesh Chandra v. State of Rajasthan: (1982) 2 SCC 202. (Para 54)
Kumari Madhuri PatiI and another v. Additional Commissioner
Ram Sukh v. Dinesh Aggarwal: 2009 (8) SCJ 1. (Para 13)
State of Maharashtra and others v Mana Adim Jamai Mandai: 2006 (3) SCJ 791. (Para 15)
Parsram and another v Shivchand and others: AIR 1969 SC 597. (Para 15)
State of Maharashtra v. Milind and others: AIR 2001 SC 393 = 2001 (2) ALT 21.5 (DN SC). (Para 15)
Nityanand Sarma and another v. State of Bihar and others: (1996) 3 SCC 576. (Para 16)
Jagdev Singh Sidhanti v Pratap Singh Daulta: AIR 1965 SC 183. (Para 18)
Biswambhar Singh and Oohers v. State of Orissa and another: AIR 1954 SC 139. (Para 20)
Mubarak Ali Ahmed v. State of Bombay: AIR 1957 SC 857. (Para 21)
Smt. Prem Lata v. Arhant Kumar Jain: AIR 1973 SC 626. (Para 22)
Kalva Devadattam and others v. Union of India: AIR 1964 SC 880. (Para 23)
Madamanchi Ramappa and another v. Muthaluru I3ojappa: AIR 1963 SC 1633. (Para 24)
Gopala Krishnaji Ketkar v. Mohammed Haji Latif: AIR 1968 SC 1413. (Para 25)
Dattatreya v. Raghunath Gopalrao Kawathekar AIR 1971 SC 2548. (Para 27)
Smt. Vijaya Kari v. Smt.Kondamuri Swarnalatha: AIR 1983 AP 181. (Para 28)
Ishwar Dass Jain v. Sohan Lal: AIR 2000 SC 426. (Para 29)
Rosammal Issectheenammal Fernandez v. Joosa Mariyan Fernandez: AIR 2000 SC 2857. (Para 30)
Bhimappa and others v. Allisab and others: AIR 2006 KAR 231. (Para 32)
Smt. Radha Bai Ananda Rao v. S.suvarna Cumar and another: (1980) 3 SCC 169. (Para 34)
Punit Rai v Dinesh Chaudhary: (2003) 8 SCC 204. (Para 35)
Samant N. Balkrishna and another v. George Fernandez and others: (1969) 3 SCC 238.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.